Background Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a major risk-factor for ischaemic stroke (IS) and transient ischaemic attack (TIA). The timely detection of first-diagnosed AF (nAF), and subsequently commencing anticoagulation, is crucial to prevent recurrence, however, the optimal timing and duration of rhythm monitoring to detect nAF remains unclear. Aims We searched MEDLINE, PubMed, Cochrane database, and Google Scholar to undertake a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCT) between 2012-2023 investigating nAF detection after IS and TIA. Outcome measures were overall detection of nAF (control; (usual care) compared to intervention; (continuous cardiac monitoring >72h)) and the time period in which nAF detection is highest (0-14 days, 15-90 days, 91-180 days or 181-365 days). A random-effects model with generic inverse variance weights was used to pool the most adjusted effect measure from each trial. Summary of review A total of eight RCTs investigated rhythm monitoring after IS, totaling 5820 patients. The meta-analysis of the studies suggested that continuous cardiac monitoring was associated with a pooled odds ratio of 3.81 (95% CI 2.14 to 6.77), compared to usual care (control), for nAF detection. In the time period analysis, the odds ratio for nAF detection at 0-14 days, 15-90 days, 91-180 days, 181-365 days were 1.79 (1.24-2.58); 2.01 (0.63-6.37); 0.98 (0.16-5.90) and 2.92 (1.30-6.56) respectively. Conclusion There is an almost 4-fold increase in nAF detection with continuous cardiac monitoring, compared to usual care. The results also demonstrate two statistically significant time periods in nAF detection; at 0-14 days and 6-12 months following monitoring commencement. These data support the utilisation of different monitoring methods to cover both time periods and a minimum of 1 year of monitoring to maximise nAF detection in patients after IS and TIA.