2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2015.11.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A meta-analysis of efficacy and safety of aripiprazole in adult and pediatric bipolar disorder in randomized controlled trials and observational studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparison to two recent meta-analyses (Brown et al, 2013;Meduri et al, 2016), our study provided more information on the analysis of adverse reactions and preventive efficacy as shown by relapse rates from bipolar mania to bipolar depression. The more recent search dates and stricter inclusion criteria (only RCTs in this meta-analysis) mean that the results of this meta-analysis are more up-to-date compared to the previous reports.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscript Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Comparison to two recent meta-analyses (Brown et al, 2013;Meduri et al, 2016), our study provided more information on the analysis of adverse reactions and preventive efficacy as shown by relapse rates from bipolar mania to bipolar depression. The more recent search dates and stricter inclusion criteria (only RCTs in this meta-analysis) mean that the results of this meta-analysis are more up-to-date compared to the previous reports.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscript Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…In addition, the dose-dependent responses and adverse reactions to antipsychotic drugs should be considered with caution; however, aripiprazole has been approved for the treatment of BD in pediatric patients by the FDA in the USA and the EMA in the EU for its efficacy and safety. Furthermore, the previous two studies (Brown et al, 2013;Meduri et al, 2016) also included above two studies into their analyses. However, despite the apparent good tolerability, the results of this meta-analysis should be interpreted with caution for application in clinical practice in pediatric patients.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscript Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations