A meta-analysis of ecotoxicological models used for plant protection product risk assessment before their placing on the market

Larras, Floriane; Beaudouin, Rémy; Berny, Philippe; Charles, Sandrine; Chaumot, Arnaud; Corio‐Costet, Marie‐France; Doussan, Isabelle; Pelosi, Céline; Leenhardt, Sophie; Mamy, Laure

doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.157003

Cited by 5 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 33 publications

(42 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…It is evident that alternatives to the use of Carbaryl and Carbosulfan will be needed to manage H. robusta in Vietnam in the future. Many plant protection products are damaging for biodiversity and the environment and ecological issues arising from their use (Klingelhöfer et al 2022) and risk assessment (Larras et al 2022) are ongoing research concerns. To reduce the widespread use of chemical insecticides in Vietnam, considerable effort will be required to develop safe alternatives.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Integrated pest management of Hypsipyla robusta shoot-tip borer (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) in Chukrasia tabularis (Sapindales: Meliaceae)

Minh

Pham

Nhung

et al. 2023

Journal of Economic Entomology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Chukrasia tabularis A. Juss produces a valuable timber but plantations are susceptible to attack by the shoot-tip borer Hypsipyla robusta Moore. An integrated pest management (IPM) approach is desirable to limit the extent of damage. Therefore, this study was undertaken to evaluate the deployment of IPM measures in plantations in Vietnam. Data on tree damage and the biology of H. robusta were gathered in 4 provinces over one year and used to build an investigation schedule. Two preliminary IPM trials were then established in which Bacillus thuringiensis and Metarhizium anisopliae were applied to the foliage when the damage incidence (P%) was in the range 5–10%; and insecticides (Carbaryl, Carbosulfan) were applied when the P% exceeded 10%. In addition, larvae and pupae were removed manually over time. In the first trial, the combination of manual and biological control methods reduced the damage index (DI) of trees from 4 tolerant families by 82% compared to the untreated control plots. In the second trial using standard planting stock, application of insecticides was required to reduce the DI by 83%. Six extended IPM trials were undertaken using the same IPM protocols and these reduced the DI to the same extent as in the preliminary trials. Over an 18-month period, the deployment of IPM increased height growth by 19–22% and diameter growth by 38–41% compared to the controls. These findings highlight the value of planting improved seed and the benefit of adopting an IPM approach to manage the shoot-tip borer.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Integrated pest management of Hypsipyla robusta shoot-tip borer (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) in Chukrasia tabularis (Sapindales: Meliaceae)

Minh

Pham

Nhung

et al. 2023

Journal of Economic Entomology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The latter are essentially limited to QSAR (quantitative structure-activity relationship) models, DR (dose-response) models and SSD (species sensitivity distribution) models. More complex models such as TKTD (toxicokinetic-toxicodynamic), 'population', 'community', 'food web', 'mixture', and landscape scale models as well as exposome models are only rarely used (Larras et al, 2022b). Although this gap has been identified for more than a decade, the acceptance and validation of these complex models by risk assessment agencies remains limited.…”

Section: Limited Use Of Modellingmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Furthermore, no model integrates the land-sea continuum. The principal models used to assess the effects of PPPs are QSAR, DR, TKTD and SSD (Larras et al, 2022b). So-called 'population', 'community' and 'landscape' models are still not widely used at the regulatory level, despite their acknowledged value (Topping and Luttik, 2017;Topping et al, 2020;Larras et al, 2022).…”

Section: Scientific Tools That Can Be Mobilisedmentioning

confidence: 99%

Impacts of plant protection products on biodiversity and ecosystem services

Leenhardt,

Mamy,

Pesce

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The publication of this book received financial support from the French Biodiversity Agency (AFB), now the French Office for Biodiversity (OFB) as manager of the funds of the Ecophyto II national action plan (AFB/2019-327 agreement). This book is a synthesis of a collective scientific assessment (CSA) requested jointly by the Ministries of Ecology, Agriculture and Research. It was produced by a group of scientific experts without prior approval by either the sponsors, INRAE or Ifremer. The present summary, taken from the extended report, is the sole responsibility of its authors.The documents associated with this assessment are available on the websites of INRAE (www.inrae.fr) and Ifremer (www.ifremer.fr).

show abstract

Regulatory framework for the assessment of the impacts of plant protection products on biodiversity: review of strengths and limits

Doussan,

Barthélémy,

Berny

et al. 2024

Environ Sci Pollut Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A meta-analysis of ecotoxicological models used for plant protection product risk assessment before their placing on the market

Cited by 5 publications

References 33 publications

Integrated pest management of Hypsipyla robusta shoot-tip borer (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) in Chukrasia tabularis (Sapindales: Meliaceae)

Integrated pest management of Hypsipyla robusta shoot-tip borer (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) in Chukrasia tabularis (Sapindales: Meliaceae)

Impacts of plant protection products on biodiversity and ecosystem services

Regulatory framework for the assessment of the impacts of plant protection products on biodiversity: review of strengths and limits

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About