2009
DOI: 10.1038/jes.2009.42
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A meta-analysis of children's object-to-mouth frequency data for estimating non-dietary ingestion exposure

Abstract: To improve estimates of non-dietary ingestion in probabilistic exposure modeling, a meta-analysis of children's object-to-mouth frequency was conducted using data from seven available studies representing 438 participants and B1500 h of behavior observation. The analysis represents the first comprehensive effort to fit object-to-mouth frequency variability and uncertainty distributions by indoor/outdoor location and by age groups recommended by the US Environmental Protection Agency for assessing childhood exp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
51
1
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
51
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The main sources of lead exposure in these studies were possibly lead-based paint and lead-contaminated house dust, air and soil, which affect younger children more than older ones due to infants and toddlers' mouthing behaviour. As age increases, both indoor and outdoor object-to-mouth frequencies decrease (Xue et al 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The main sources of lead exposure in these studies were possibly lead-based paint and lead-contaminated house dust, air and soil, which affect younger children more than older ones due to infants and toddlers' mouthing behaviour. As age increases, both indoor and outdoor object-to-mouth frequencies decrease (Xue et al 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Our team agreed that recording every mouthing contact was possible with reasonable accuracy, since it was a less rapid behavior and thus recorded every object contact with the mouth. Similar to previous methods, observers recorded a contact even if the same portion of the object had previously entered the mouth [21,30]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequent and frequent hand-to-mouth behaviors result in ingestion of fecal microbes and potentially pathogens, on the hands [21,26,27,28,29]. In addition, children can directly ingest pathogens by placing contaminated objects in their mouth or directly eating soil contaminated by pathogens [21,25,30,31]. Hand-to-mouth contacts in the household may result in even greater ingestion of feces than consuming unclean drinking water [20], indicating non-dietary ingestion during play may be an important pathway for diarrheal disease in young children.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…age 26; 28; 3134; 41; 42 , gender 29; 31; 34 and location 29; 33; 34; 41; 42 may affect children’s mouthing frequency and/or duration. Moreover, the pacifier is a specific object which younger children mouth regardless of time of day.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%