2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10899-018-09818-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Meta-analysis of Brief Personalized Feedback Interventions for Problematic Gambling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Jim enez-Murcia et al, 2016Merkouris et al, 2016). The resistance to CBT found in many studies has also led to considering the inclusion of supplementary strategies to improve emotional regulation and decrease impulsivity levels in therapeutic plans, with promising therapeutic effectiveness (Mallorquí-Bagu e et al, 2018;Peter et al, 2019;T arrega et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jim enez-Murcia et al, 2016Merkouris et al, 2016). The resistance to CBT found in many studies has also led to considering the inclusion of supplementary strategies to improve emotional regulation and decrease impulsivity levels in therapeutic plans, with promising therapeutic effectiveness (Mallorquí-Bagu e et al, 2018;Peter et al, 2019;T arrega et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The percentage of individuals working full‐time (67%) in the sample may reflect this. Second, brief intervention effects may have been more powerful if delivered in person rather than entirely via the Internet, especially if other intervention components, such as motivational interviewing, were incorporated (73). Finally, while substance use treatment was captured, other psychological comorbidities, which may have impacted treatment seeking and gambling attitudes, were not examined.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two reviews considered brief psychological interventions for gambling-related harms. Peters and colleagues 30 found that, in brief interventions of one session, the strongest predictor of short-term positive effect was the inclusion of an educational element, followed by motivational interviewing (n=11 studies). By contrast, Quilty and colleagues 31 defined brief interventions as interventions that last no more than three sessions and found evidence of a small but significant reduction in gambling behaviour in the short term.…”
Section: Targeted Interventions For Individuals At Increased Risk Of Harm Therapeutic Interventionsmentioning
confidence: 99%