2021
DOI: 10.1111/cobi.13656
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A meta‐analysis of anthropogenic impacts on physiological stress in wild primates

Abstract: As humanity continues to alter the environment extensively, comprehending the effect of anthropogenic disturbances on the health, survival, and fitness of wildlife is a crucial question for conservation science. Many primate populations occupy suboptimal habitats prone to diverse anthropogenic disturbances that may be sources of acute and chronic stress. Quantification of glucocorticoid (GC) concentrations has repeatedly been used to explore the impact of disturbances on physiological stress. Although it is st… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
1
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
0
21
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of felled logs or cut tree trunk remains, the vernacular species name was recorded. We recognize that various anthropogenic disturbances may have different levels of impact on NSLs as shown in other studies (Kaisin et al, 2020), however, for this study, all disturbances were weighted equally.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the case of felled logs or cut tree trunk remains, the vernacular species name was recorded. We recognize that various anthropogenic disturbances may have different levels of impact on NSLs as shown in other studies (Kaisin et al, 2020), however, for this study, all disturbances were weighted equally.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…In the case of felled logs or cut tree trunk remains, the vernacular species name was recorded. We recognize that various anthropogenic disturbances may have different levels of impact on NSLs as shown in other studies (Kaisin et al, 2020), however, for this study, all disturbances were weighted equally. elsewhere (Dinsmore et al, 2018); however, it is important to note that the anthropogenic disturbances analyzed in this study could be distinguished from those caused by the cyclone, as felled trees appeared distinct from those uprooted or snapped as a result of the cyclone.…”
Section: Human Disturbancesmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Extended research is also needed to investigate whether there are long-term fitness effects associated with our findings in non-natal orphans. Importantly, we cannot equate altered GC concentrations with reduced fitness 57,58 ; non-natal orphans in this study survived the duration of sampling, despite orphans having a lower survival probability in general 25 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Most of the available studies on responses of arboreal mammals to habitat fragmentation and disturbances are based on sign surveys, e.g. marsupials (Youngentob et al 2013 ; Lindenmayer et al 2021 ), primates (Almeida-Rocha et al 2017 ; Kaisin et al 2021 ) and tropical mammals (Whitworth et al 2019 ). Further, GPS telemetry coupled with camera trapping has not yet been applied in studying how arboreal mammals are adapting in human-dominated landscapes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%