2022
DOI: 10.1007/s00264-022-05318-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A meta-analysis comparing the short- and mid- to long-term outcomes of artificial cervical disc replacement(ACDR) with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for the treatment of cervical degenerative disc disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…T he popularity of CDA as a motion-preserving treatment of degenerative disc disease has increased since its introduction in the early 2000s, with favorable outcomes compared with ACDF [4][5][6][7][8][9][10] . Given that it is a relatively new technology, our understanding of its durability and potential complications that may arise in the future is limited.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…T he popularity of CDA as a motion-preserving treatment of degenerative disc disease has increased since its introduction in the early 2000s, with favorable outcomes compared with ACDF [4][5][6][7][8][9][10] . Given that it is a relatively new technology, our understanding of its durability and potential complications that may arise in the future is limited.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Toward investigating the impact of anterior cervical interbody fusion and the influence of over-distraction (i.e., using larger interbody cages) on the biomechanics of the lower cervical spine, post-operative (Post-op) FE models were reconstructed for all 20 patients. Four clinical scenarios were predicted for each patient and the relevant post-op FE models were developed including ( Zagra et al, 2013 ) No-distraction, ( Robinson, 1955 ), 1 mm distraction, ( Jacobs et al, 2011 ), 2 mm distraction, and ( Peng et al, 2022 ) 3 mm distraction ( Figure 1D ). To achieve this aim, we have adopted the pre-op index disc height as a key parameter for defining the interbody height in the first scenario (i.e., No-distraction).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is widely acknowledged as the gold standard and has been consistently cited as one of the most effective and safe surgical interventions in cases where conservative management techniques prove ineffective ( Robinson, 1955 ; Jacobs et al, 2011 ; Zagra et al, 2013 ). This procedure has garnered substantial recognition for its successful outcomes in relieving symptoms and addressing various cervical spine pathologies, such as disc herniation, spinal stenosis, and degenerative disc disease ( Peng et al, 2022 ). The remarkable efficacy and safety profile of ACDF have contributed to its widespread adoption by clinicians and have made it a preferred option for patients who require surgical intervention to alleviate cervical spine-related conditions ( Tsalimas et al, 2022 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, there has been robust evidence of cervical arthroplasty showing favorable outcomes with artificial disc replacement. 44 Therefore, anterior endoscopic cervical discectomy (AECD) is usually considered when patients with a high risk of general anesthesia have cervical myelopathy or radiculopathy caused by soft disc herniation. The preliminary series showed comparable outcomes comparing the conventional anterior cervical discectomy with fusion.…”
Section: Indications Of Ess For Cervical Spinementioning
confidence: 99%