Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2021.103626
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Mesoproterozoic carbonate platform (lower Belt Supergroup of western North America): Sediments, facies, tides, tsunamis and earthquakes in a tectonically active intracratonic basin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 119 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Instead, many carbonate platform strata, when observed carefully in outcrop and especially when analyzed using robust quantitative methods, are more complex and noisier (Wilkinson et al ., 1999; Bosence et al ., 2009; Burgess, 2016). The complexity and noise may arise from processes such as tidal channel migration, storm erosion, slope instability, tsunami backwash and various biological activities, that are not modelled here, but can make strata effectively indistinguishable from random successions (Wanless, 1981; Cloyd et al ., 1990; Peper & Cloetingh, 1995; Bosence et al ., 2009; Samankassou & Enos, 2019; Pratt & Rule, 2021). Nevertheless, whenever strong evidence for ordered strata with only weak or no evidence for relative sea‐level forcing [for example, abnormal subaerial exposure of subtidal strata, see Lehrmann & Goldhammer (1999)], autogenic cyclicity due to self‐organization should always be considered as a possible explanation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, many carbonate platform strata, when observed carefully in outcrop and especially when analyzed using robust quantitative methods, are more complex and noisier (Wilkinson et al ., 1999; Bosence et al ., 2009; Burgess, 2016). The complexity and noise may arise from processes such as tidal channel migration, storm erosion, slope instability, tsunami backwash and various biological activities, that are not modelled here, but can make strata effectively indistinguishable from random successions (Wanless, 1981; Cloyd et al ., 1990; Peper & Cloetingh, 1995; Bosence et al ., 2009; Samankassou & Enos, 2019; Pratt & Rule, 2021). Nevertheless, whenever strong evidence for ordered strata with only weak or no evidence for relative sea‐level forcing [for example, abnormal subaerial exposure of subtidal strata, see Lehrmann & Goldhammer (1999)], autogenic cyclicity due to self‐organization should always be considered as a possible explanation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3). Pratt (2017Pratt ( , 2021 studied the mixed and disorderly tabular-pebbles depositing in Deadwood Formation of Upper Cambrian in the middle and northern parts of Montana, the United States. The tabular-pebbles, with lithology of thin-layer calcareous ne sandstone and silty mud shale, are interbedded with horizontal-lamina calcareous ne sandstone and silty mud shale.…”
Section: Tabular-pebblesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some tabular blocks are disturbed by waves (tsunami) triggered by earthquake, redeposited, and then formed mussily accumulated tabular-pebbles after redeposition (Figure . 2g-h; Figure . 3). Pratt studied the mixed and disorderly tabular-pebbles depositing in Deadwood Formation of Upper Cambrian in the middle and northern parts of Montana, the United States [54,55]. The tabular-pebbles, with lithology of J Mari Scie Res Ocean, 2022 thin-layer calcareous fine sandstone and silty mud shale, are interbedded with horizontal-lamina calcareous fine sandstone and silty mud shale.…”
Section: Tabular-pebblesmentioning
confidence: 99%