2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.camwa.2019.05.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A meshless singular boundary method for transient heat conduction problems in layered materials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to get rid of the complexity of mesh generation and reduce the time of preprocessing, various meshless methods have devoted considerable attention. These approaches include the elementfree Galerkin method [8][9][10][11], the reproducing kernel particle method [12][13][14][15], the meshless local Petrov-Galerkin method [16,17], the radial basis function collocation method (RBFCM) [18,19], the generalized finite difference method (GFDM) [20][21][22][23], the singular boundary method (SBM) [24,25], the method of fundamental solutions (MFS) [26,27] and the boundary knot method (BKM) [28,29], etc. The successful application of these meshless methods fully demonstrates their development prospect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to get rid of the complexity of mesh generation and reduce the time of preprocessing, various meshless methods have devoted considerable attention. These approaches include the elementfree Galerkin method [8][9][10][11], the reproducing kernel particle method [12][13][14][15], the meshless local Petrov-Galerkin method [16,17], the radial basis function collocation method (RBFCM) [18,19], the generalized finite difference method (GFDM) [20][21][22][23], the singular boundary method (SBM) [24,25], the method of fundamental solutions (MFS) [26,27] and the boundary knot method (BKM) [28,29], etc. The successful application of these meshless methods fully demonstrates their development prospect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In SBM, the source points and the collocation points are the same set of points, and the interpolating basis function is the fundamental solution, but the SBM introduced the original intensity factors (OIFs) to eliminate the singularity of the fundamental solution, which appears when the source point and the collocation point coincide. Prior to this study, the SBM has been successfully used to solve various physical problems such as potential problems [38], heat conduction problems [39,40], wave equations [41,42] and elastic problems [43,44].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The developed meshless approaches can be classified into collocation-based and Galerkin-based methods. Compared with the latter, the meshless collocation methods have the advantages of no numerical quadrature and mesh generation, and some of these are the localized method of fundamental solutions (LMFS) [20][21][22], the generalized finite difference method (GFDM) [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33], the localized Chebyshev collocation method [34], the singular boundary method (SBM) [35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43], and the localized knot method (LKM) [44].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%