2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.amc.2011.05.100
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A meshless local moving Kriging method for two-dimensional solids

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Authors of [80] studied the difference between the meshfree shape functions created based on the point interpolation and the Kriging interpolation formulas. An improved meshless local Petrov-Galerkin method (MLPG) for stress analysis of two-dimensional solids is presented in [81]. As said in [81], the essential boundary conditions can be enforced similar to the FEM, no domain integration is needed and only regular boundary integration is involved.…”
Section: A Brief Review For Element Free Galerkin (Efg)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Authors of [80] studied the difference between the meshfree shape functions created based on the point interpolation and the Kriging interpolation formulas. An improved meshless local Petrov-Galerkin method (MLPG) for stress analysis of two-dimensional solids is presented in [81]. As said in [81], the essential boundary conditions can be enforced similar to the FEM, no domain integration is needed and only regular boundary integration is involved.…”
Section: A Brief Review For Element Free Galerkin (Efg)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An improved meshless local Petrov-Galerkin method (MLPG) for stress analysis of two-dimensional solids is presented in [81]. As said in [81], the essential boundary conditions can be enforced similar to the FEM, no domain integration is needed and only regular boundary integration is involved.…”
Section: A Brief Review For Element Free Galerkin (Efg)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The element-free or mesh-free methods have been extensively researched because of its important application for solving mathematical and physical problems [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10]; especially when the traditional computational methods are not well suited for such problems that involved extremely large deformation, dynamic fracturing or explosion problems [11]. Based on different approximation functions, various element-free or mesh-free methods were proposed, including the element-free Galerkin method [12], the hp clouds method [13], the moving least-squares differential quadrature method [14,15], the reproducing kernel particle method [16], wavelet particle method [17], the radial point interpolation method [18][19][20], the complex variable meshless method [21,22] and the meshless boundary integral equation methods [23,24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shape functions are based on a set of nodes and a certain weight function with a local support associated with each of these nodes. Therefore, they can solve many engineering problems that are not suited to the conventional computational methods [17,47,53]. Bhrawy et al [10] reported a new spectral collocation technique for solving second kind Fredholm integral equations (FIEs).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%