A Mesh‐Adjustable Molecular Sieve for General Use in Gas Separation

Abstract

Gas separation using molecular sieves (MSs) is a environmentally benign, energy-conserving alternative to traditional separation processes, such as distillation and absorption. [1] When using zeolite MSs, [2][3][4] an accurate one-on-one match between the mesh size and the separation need is essential. However, when the size disparity of the two gases to be separated is small, a MS with the optimum mesh size is not always readily available. A mismatch inevitably leads to an inefficient separation. Recently, titanosilicate was shown to possess superior flexibility over that of traditional zeolites; a few MSs with discrete mesh sizes were made based on the degree of dehydration of this material at various temperatures.[5] Nevertheless, a MS with more than one mesh size has never been made in the past. Herein, we report the design, synthesis, and application of a novel mesh-adjustable molecular sieve (MAMS-1) that possesses an infinite number of mesh sizes. MAMS-1 is based on a metal-organic framework (MOF), compounds known for their dynamic porous properties.[6] However, the concept of a MAMS has never appeared in the literature prior to the present work. MAMS-1 represents a MOF-based MS whose mesh can be adjusted continuously. The mesh range of MAMS-1 falls between 2.9 and 5.0 , which covers the size range of almost all commercially important gas separations. When the temperature is precisely controlled, any mesh size within this range can be accurately attained. Gas separations such as those of N 2 /O 2 and N 2 /CH 4 , which are normally difficult to achieve, are readily attainable by using MAMS-1. In principle, by precise temperature control, any two gases with a size difference can be separated by a MAMS.MOFs have attracted a great deal of attention because of their unique structures [6a, 7] and potential applications in catalysis, [8] separation, [9] and gas storage. [10] In particular, flexible MOFs [6] have caught enormous attention lately. Numerous studies have indicated that the key to constructing a flexible MOF lies in the utilization of weak interactions, such as hydrogen bonding, p-p stacking, and hydrophobic interaction, in addition to strong covalent and coordinative bonding.[6] Flexible MOFs based on hydrogen bonding have been widely studied, [6b,c] but those originating from p-p stacking and hydrophobic interaction [11] have rarely been explored.To make a MAMS, two factors must be taken into account: the material must have permanent porosity to hold gas molecules, and the pores must be flexible. The former usually requires strong bonds, while the latter implies weak interactions in the framework. These two seemingly irreconcilable prerequisites for a MAMS can be met simultaneously by using a graphitic structure, in which atoms in each layer are connected covalently but the layers are held together by weak interactions. One approach to such a graphitic MOF is to apply an amphiphilic ligand that consists of hydrophobic and hydrophilic ends, similar to a surfactant, [12] but with the hydrophilic ...

Biogas Management: Advanced Utilization for Production of Renewable Energy and Added-value Chemicals

“…Upgrading strategies are mostly based on physical and/or chemical absorption in water or in active aqueous solutions (Cebula, 2009;Petersson and Wellinger, 2009;Kismurtono, 2011;Ryckebosch et al, 2011;Bansal et al, 2013;Khalil et al, 2014;Kohl and Nielsen, 1997) or adsorption on solid surfaces (Pandey and Fabian, 1989;Dabrowski, 2001;Jee et al, 2001;Yang, 2003;Himeno et al, 2005;Grande and Rodrigues, 2007;Ma et al, 2007;Cavenati et al, 2008;Das et al, 2008;Alonso-Vicario et al, 2010;Tippayawong and Thanompongchart, 2010;Grande, 2011Grande, , 2012Yuan et al, 2013;Andriani et al, 2014), membrane separation methods (Wellinger and Lindberg, 2005;Favre et al, 2009;Petersson and Wellinger, 2009;Simons et al, 2009;Deng and Hagg, 2010;Makaruk et al, 2010;Ryckebosch et al, 2011;Andriani et al, 2014;Salihu and Alam, 2015), and biological methods (Ryckebosch et al, 2011;Andriani et al, 2014;Salihu and Alam, 2015) or even combinations of the above (Bansal et al, 2013).…”

Modeling adsorption equilibria of xylene isomers in a microporous metal–organic framework

“…Contrasting to zeolites, which have pores confined by tetrahedral oxide skeletons, the pores within MOFs can be systematically varied by the judicious choice of the metal-containing and/or organic ligands [19]. Due to their unusual features, MOFs are considered promising materials for gas storage, adsorption separations and catalysis [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32].…”

Amorphous Infinite Coordination Polymer Microparticles: A New Class of Selective Hydrogen Storage Materials

“…[2,[7][8][9][10][11] The crystalline MOFs are a particularly interesting class of materials as they have highly tailorable porosities and internal chemical functionalization, and significant advances have been realized through the generation of structures that can not only selectively uptake H 2 in the presence of N 2 but also differentiate other gases such as O 2 and CO 2 . [7,11,12] Our group recently introduced the concept of amorphous infinite coordination polymer (ICP) (nano-and micro)particles, which are prepared from organometallic ligands and metal ion connecting nodes (Scheme 1). [13,14] There are now a variety of ways of making ICP particles and related structures from a broad class of metal nodes and both organic and organometallic ligands.…”