2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2020.104766
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A mesh adaptation strategy for complex wall-modeled turbomachinery LES

Abstract: A mesh adaptation methodology for wall-modeled turbomachinery Large Eddy Simulation (LES) is proposed, simultaneously taking into account two quantities of interest: the average kinetic energy dissipation rate and the normalized wall distance y + . This strategy is first tested on a highly loaded transonic blade with separated flow, and is compared to wall-resolved LES results, as well as experimental data. The adaptation methodology allows to predict fairly well the boundary layer transition on the suction si… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This range of implies that the first point off the wall of the WMLES mesh is typically within the logarithmic layer or the upper part of the buffer layer, in the case of a fully developed turbulent boundary layer. It is suitable for instance in turbomachinery-flow simulations (Leonard et al, 2016; Dombard et al, 2020; Odier et al, 2021). Indeed, while real turbomachines are typically not instrumented for boundary-layer measurements, experimental measurements, and high-fidelity LESs show that the friction Reynolds number based on boundary-layer thickness is in the range of 600–1000 in academic linear blade cascades with realistic operating conditions in terms of Reynolds and Mach numbers (Arts et al, 1990; Ma et al, 2011; Gao et al, 2015; Zambonini et al, 2017; Dupuy et al, 2020).…”
Section: Databasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This range of implies that the first point off the wall of the WMLES mesh is typically within the logarithmic layer or the upper part of the buffer layer, in the case of a fully developed turbulent boundary layer. It is suitable for instance in turbomachinery-flow simulations (Leonard et al, 2016; Dombard et al, 2020; Odier et al, 2021). Indeed, while real turbomachines are typically not instrumented for boundary-layer measurements, experimental measurements, and high-fidelity LESs show that the friction Reynolds number based on boundary-layer thickness is in the range of 600–1000 in academic linear blade cascades with realistic operating conditions in terms of Reynolds and Mach numbers (Arts et al, 1990; Ma et al, 2011; Gao et al, 2015; Zambonini et al, 2017; Dupuy et al, 2020).…”
Section: Databasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This range determines the range of mesh resolution that the machine-learning model can operate on, and thus indirectly the maximal Reynolds number that can be addressed a posteriori at moderate computational cost. The presently used range of ∆ + y =25 -75 is suitable for instance in turbomachinery-flow simulations [24,54,70]. The two tangential axes of the WMLES grid are randomly generated, and thus not necessarily aligned with those of the corresponding highly-resolved simulation.…”
Section: Data Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%