1984
DOI: 10.1086/184384
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A medium-bright quasar sample - New quasar surface densities in the magnitude range from 16.4 to 17.65 for B

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our spectrum (Fig. 7) shows narrow emission lines (F W HM < (Sanduleak & Pesch 1984) is an emission line galaxy (Mitchell et al 1984), and a Seyfert 1.5 galaxy according to Everett & Wagner (1995). This is confirmed by our spectrum (Fig.…”
Section: Observationssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Our spectrum (Fig. 7) shows narrow emission lines (F W HM < (Sanduleak & Pesch 1984) is an emission line galaxy (Mitchell et al 1984), and a Seyfert 1.5 galaxy according to Everett & Wagner (1995). This is confirmed by our spectrum (Fig.…”
Section: Observationssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Among the most efficient selection methods have been objective-prism surveys. At bright magnitudes, the well-known QSO surveys include the Bright Quasar Survey (Schmidt & Green 1983), the Medium-Bright Quasar Sample (Mitchell, Warnock, & Usher 1984), the Large Bright Quasar Survey (Hewett, Foltz, & Cha †ee 1995), the Homogeneous Bright QSO Survey (La Franca & Cristiani 1997), and the Hamburg/ ÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈ 1 Some of the observations reported here were obtained at the MMT Observatory, a joint facility of the Smithsonian Institution and the University of Arizona. ESO Survey (Wisotzki et al 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The net result is an average undercounting by 5%, with a redshift dependence. The Medium Bright Quasar Survey (Mitchell et al 1984) shows a count slope similar to that of the BQS, but a 20% upward displacement in surface density. The cause could be a lower measuring error in magnitude for the BQS, which is unlikely, substantially higher color and accidental errors, or a scale mismatch between the two surveys.…”
mentioning
confidence: 79%