1982
DOI: 10.1097/00007632-198200710-00001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Mechanistic Classification of Closed, Indirect Fractures and Dislocations of the Lower Cervical Spine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
175
1
27

Year Published

1993
1993
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 556 publications
(207 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
175
1
27
Order By: Relevance
“…The types of fractures and dislocations were categorised according to the mechanistic classification of Allen et al [4]. Of the 144 cases, 81 were distractive flexion (DF) injuries, 25 were compressive flexion (CF), 27 were compressive extension (CE), 7 were vertical compression (VC) and 4 were distractive extension (DE).…”
Section: Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The types of fractures and dislocations were categorised according to the mechanistic classification of Allen et al [4]. Of the 144 cases, 81 were distractive flexion (DF) injuries, 25 were compressive flexion (CF), 27 were compressive extension (CE), 7 were vertical compression (VC) and 4 were distractive extension (DE).…”
Section: Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A 38-year-old man incurred a C5-7 fracture and dislocation (CE stage 5, Allen classification [4]) and an ASIA A neurological deficit. Sagittal and axial CT images showed C5-7 lamina fracture, left C5 and right C6 pedicle fracture, and C7 vertebral body fracture (Fig.…”
Section: Illustrative Casementioning
confidence: 99%
“…There may be rotation of the articular mass in either the sagittal or the coronal plane with this injury resulting in characteristic findings on the radiographic examination. The mechanism of injury is hyperextension with rotation, although flexion and rotation has also been implicated [24,25,26,27]. This injury may be associated with other fractures and with contralateral facet dislocation.…”
Section: Traumatic Isolation Of the Articular Pillarmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This injury results from a flexion and lateral rotation mechanism [26,30]. The most frequent levels of occurrence are C5±6 and C6±7, although this entity may be seen at other levels as well, even at C2±3 [31].…”
Section: Unilateral Interfacetal Dislocationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a first step, we began to quantify the stabilizing potential of ACFP depending on the extent of destruction of posterior ligaments [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%