2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00540-021-02930-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A mechanism of re-sedation caused by remimazolam

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Accordingly, after administration of flumazenil, patients should be monitored for re-sedation, respiratory depression, and other persistent or recurrent hypnotic effects for a sufficient time period. In practice, routine administration of flumazenil to reverse remimazolam-induced sedation is not recommended because of the likelihood of rebound sedation [ 49 , 50 ].…”
Section: Clinical Applications Of Remimazolammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, after administration of flumazenil, patients should be monitored for re-sedation, respiratory depression, and other persistent or recurrent hypnotic effects for a sufficient time period. In practice, routine administration of flumazenil to reverse remimazolam-induced sedation is not recommended because of the likelihood of rebound sedation [ 49 , 50 ].…”
Section: Clinical Applications Of Remimazolammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There has been an observation of re-sedation after flumazenil reversal ( Yamamoto et al, 2021b ; Yamamoto et al, 2021a ). This may have been due to residual remimazolam, the metabolite CNS 7054 building up to levels that can activate the GABA A receptor or a combination of both, potentially as a result of compromised organ function.…”
Section: Remimazolammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with patients in the RT group, the EP group's onset time was significantly higher in (41 s vs 32 [26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41] s, p < 0.05; Table 3). However, there were no significant differences in the procedure time (p = 0.846) or cecal intubation time (p = 0.320) between the two groups (Table 3).…”
Section: Secondary Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…39 A recent study highlighted the clinical benefits of using electroencephalogram measures, which significantly correlate with sedation scale scores and do not require patient stimulation. 39,40 We did not apply routine flumazenil reversal at the end of the colonoscopies because of the possibility of resedation and economic reasons. 41 Dehydration after bowel preparation combined with the vasodilatory effects of fentanyl is considered the main causes of perioperative hypotension.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%