1997
DOI: 10.1084/jem.186.7.1059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Mechanism for the Major Histocompatibility Complex–linked Resistance to Autoimmunity

Abstract: Certain major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II haplotypes encode elements providing either susceptibility or dominant resistance to the development of spontaneous autoimmune diseases via mechanisms that remain undefined. Here we show that a pancreatic beta cell–reactive, I-Ag7–restricted, transgenic TCR that is highly diabetogenic in nonobese diabetic mice (H-2g7) undergoes thymocyte negative selection in diabetes-resistant H-2g7/b, H-2g7/k, H-2g7/q, and H-2g7/nb1 NOD mice by engaging antidiabetogenic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

10
152
1
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 187 publications
(165 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
10
152
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thymocyte deletion occurs to varying extents in these mice, depending upon the specific MHC class II allele. Mice that delete the transgenic TCR develop insulitis to variable degrees that correlate with the extent of thymocyte deletion, but are quite resistant to the development of diabetes (36). Extrapolation of this data to the current findings suggests that disease-resistant MHC class II alleles mediate their protection by not selecting for an autoreactive T cell repertoire.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 49%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thymocyte deletion occurs to varying extents in these mice, depending upon the specific MHC class II allele. Mice that delete the transgenic TCR develop insulitis to variable degrees that correlate with the extent of thymocyte deletion, but are quite resistant to the development of diabetes (36). Extrapolation of this data to the current findings suggests that disease-resistant MHC class II alleles mediate their protection by not selecting for an autoreactive T cell repertoire.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 49%
“…This selection of self-reactive cells appears to require the presence of diabetes-susceptible MHC alleles as control transgenic mice having either resistant (A␤o/DQ6, DQB1*0602) or combinations of resistant and susceptible alleles (A␤o/DR2/DQ8; A␤o/DR3/DQ6) were unable to mount effective responses to GAD 65. It has been reported that a pancreatic ␤ cell-reactive, I-A g7 -restricted transgenic TCR that is strongly diabetogenic in NOD mice is negatively selected in the thymus of mice expressing various diabetes-resistant MHC alleles transgenically, along with a single I-A g7 allele on the NOD background (36) by engaging antidiabetogenic MHC class II molecules on thymic bone marrow-derived APCs. Thymocyte deletion occurs to varying extents in these mice, depending upon the specific MHC class II allele.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contribution of DRB1 molecule toward T cell selection is further supported by the fact that DW10 mice mount milder response to CII immunization than DW4 mice and negative littermates although the major response is restricted by A q molecule. These findings are reminiscent of the MHC linked protection described in diabetes model (41). According to this model, MHC molecules provide dominant resistance to a given autoimmune disease by deleting the most pathogenic autoreactive T cells rather than all autoreactive T cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…First, the DRB3 and DRB4 genes are omitted from consideration despite their importance in many immune responses (15,16) and the fact that even single chain MHC class II genes can profoundly influence expression of autoimmune disease such as IDDM (17)(18)(19). Second, expression of independent transgenes ignores the possibility that multiple genes in the class II region contribute to disease susceptibility through interactions during positive and negative selection of the T cell repertoire or through aspects of their peripheral coregulation (20,21). Finally, any role for pseudogenes (e.g., DQB2/ A2), intergenic "junk" (22), or endogenous retroviral DNA sequences contained within MHC haplotypes (23) cannot be assessed by a single or multiple independent transgene approach.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%