2012 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conferences on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology 2012
DOI: 10.1109/wi-iat.2012.254
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Mechanism for Organizing Last-Mile Service Using Non-dedicated Fleet

Abstract: Abstract-Unprecedented pace of urbanization and rising income levels have fueled the growth of car ownership in almost all newly formed megacities. Such growth has congested the limited road space and significantly affected the quality of life in these megacities. Convincing residents to give up their cars and use public transport is the most effective way in reducing congestion; however, even with sufficient public transport capacity, the lack of last-mile (from the transport hub to the destination) travel se… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Alongside more traditional variables such as travel time and out of pocket costs, we characterize the quality of the overall trip that each alternative transportation mode provides considering pedestrian safety (as measured by crash statistics), crime levels (as given by the crime statistics in the area), degree of pedestrian friendliness (as measured by a composite index), and transit accessibility (measured by a cumulative opportunities measure). The approach allows us to estimate the degree to which these attributes influence mode preferences and thereby adds to recent work that have paid increasing attention to last mile issues and have explored potential solutions (Shaheen and Finson, 2003;Brons et al, 2009;Nelson Nygaard Consulting Associates, Alta Consulting, CALSTART, and Intrago Mobility Services, 2009;Cheng et al, 2012;Wang et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alongside more traditional variables such as travel time and out of pocket costs, we characterize the quality of the overall trip that each alternative transportation mode provides considering pedestrian safety (as measured by crash statistics), crime levels (as given by the crime statistics in the area), degree of pedestrian friendliness (as measured by a composite index), and transit accessibility (measured by a cumulative opportunities measure). The approach allows us to estimate the degree to which these attributes influence mode preferences and thereby adds to recent work that have paid increasing attention to last mile issues and have explored potential solutions (Shaheen and Finson, 2003;Brons et al, 2009;Nelson Nygaard Consulting Associates, Alta Consulting, CALSTART, and Intrago Mobility Services, 2009;Cheng et al, 2012;Wang et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Access and egress (last mile) components of transit trips also enter these considerations, but mainly as access distance or times and waiting times. More recently, however, issues around the last mile of transit ser-vice have received increasing attention [see, for example, Nelson/ Nygaard Consulting Associates et al (3), Wang (4), Deka and DiPetrillo (5), and Cheng et al (6)].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first mile problem is similar to the car pooling problem where multiple users are picked up and transported to a common flexible destination which could be any point on a public 575 transportation line (see Minett (2013)). The last mile problem considers the opposite scenario where people are picked up from the public transportation line and taken to their destinations (see Wang and Odoni (2014);Cheng et al (2012)). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%