2018
DOI: 10.1557/jmr.2017.483
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A mechanical reduced order model for elastomeric 3D printed architectures

Abstract: Abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, these methods rarely use TO to optimize complex models except for some simple cubic architectures. [47,53]…”
Section: Topology Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, these methods rarely use TO to optimize complex models except for some simple cubic architectures. [47,53]…”
Section: Topology Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Later, Maskery et al [82] investigated the effect of cell topology, orientation, and volume fraction to provide a specified stiffness in the lattice structures. Further, Weisgraber et al [83] conducted research works where they proved that by modifying cell parameters, it is possible to control the stress-strain curve of a Cellular Material to assess specific load requirements and performance. A similar study was developed by Wang et al [84], where the authors optimized lattice structures to provide specific stiffness for given multi-loading scenarios in the low volume fraction limit.…”
Section: Tailoring Stiffness Via Cellular Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although considerable progress has been achieved in hyperelastic finite deformation theory, the equation given by finite elasticity theory is complex and challenging to solve. [25] The abstraction and simplification of the related structural parameters inevitably cause a reduction in the actual performance space, which offsets the range of possible performance that can be achieved by realizing a large number of structures utilizing digital preparation technology. [26] Expensive data collection costs still impede DL as a powerful tool for constructing constitutive relation for additive manufacturing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%