1996
DOI: 10.1016/1359-6454(95)00257-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A mechanical interpretation of the activation energy of high temperature deformation in two phase materials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
57
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
6
57
1
Order By: Relevance
“…An activation energy of 430 kJ mol -1 for hot-working of solutiontreated IN718 (Type I microstructure) is in good agreement with values derived for the same material in the literature, 390-440 kJ mol -1 [8][9][10][11]. Higher values of Q for the Type II and Type III materials, as listed in Table 2, can be attributed to the presence of d precipitates; second-phase particles are known to affect the measured hot-working activation energy in steels [22] and two-phase titanium alloys [23].…”
Section: Deformation Behaviorsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…An activation energy of 430 kJ mol -1 for hot-working of solutiontreated IN718 (Type I microstructure) is in good agreement with values derived for the same material in the literature, 390-440 kJ mol -1 [8][9][10][11]. Higher values of Q for the Type II and Type III materials, as listed in Table 2, can be attributed to the presence of d precipitates; second-phase particles are known to affect the measured hot-working activation energy in steels [22] and two-phase titanium alloys [23].…”
Section: Deformation Behaviorsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…In this study, the parameters in Eq. [3] were measured three to four times along various directions of the deformed samples; the mean values of the measured results were then used.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1] [14] or [3] were obtained based upon an upper-bound theorem of rigid perfectly plastic materials. [14] The average friction coefficients at different temperatures were plotted in Figure 7 as a function of true strain.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations