2004
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0402724101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A mechanical basis for chromosome function

Abstract: We propose that chromosome function is governed by internal mechanical forces generated by programmed tendencies for expansion of the DNA͞chromatin fiber against constraining features.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

25
365
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 290 publications
(402 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
25
365
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…LinEs and crossing over: It has been proposed that axial proteins, such as Red1 in S. cerevisiae, function to introduce a compaction stress into the chromosomal structure that facilitates crossing over and might play a role in genetic interference (Blat et al 2002;Kleckner et al 2004), the latter not being apparent in S. pombe (Munz 1994). Our data are not inconsistent with LinEs generating a recombinogenic compaction stress that may enhance crossing over to above the level observed in the rec10-155 mutant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…LinEs and crossing over: It has been proposed that axial proteins, such as Red1 in S. cerevisiae, function to introduce a compaction stress into the chromosomal structure that facilitates crossing over and might play a role in genetic interference (Blat et al 2002;Kleckner et al 2004), the latter not being apparent in S. pombe (Munz 1994). Our data are not inconsistent with LinEs generating a recombinogenic compaction stress that may enhance crossing over to above the level observed in the rec10-155 mutant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The LinE structures of S. pombe and the AEs of Saccharomyces cerevisiae have conserved common features and the key structural components in the two organisms, Rec10 (S. pombe) and Red1 (S. cerevisiae), exhibit some amino acid conservation (Lorenz et al 2004). This structural conservation and the absence of a visible SC in S. pombe strongly suggest that AEs serve some function other than providing a precursory platform for SC formation; they may function by contributing to the establishment of chromosomal mechanical forces of compaction, which have been proposed to regulate meiotic recombination (Blat et al 2002;Kleckner et al 2004). Furthermore, AEs (and possibly LinEs) appear to play a critical role in directing interhomolog recombination, precluding intersister recombination events (Schwacha and Kleckner 1997;Thompson and Stahl 1999), possibly by providing a platform for Hop1 protein-mediated dimerization of the Mek1 kinase, which, like Red1 and Hop1, is required to promote interhomolog recombination (Niu et al 2005).…”
Section: S Exual Reproduction In Most Eukaryotes Involvesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measurement of chromosome mechanical properties is also important to understanding the mitotic apparatus, which is in part regulated via roughly nanonewton forces (1 nN=10 j9 newtons; a newton approximately is the gravitational force exerted by a 100 gram mass on the earth) generated in chromosomes during mitosis (Nicklas 1983, Skibbens et al 1995, Skibbens & Salmon 1997, Nicklas et al 2001, Gardner et al 2005. Chromosome mechanics has been suggested to play a variety of roles in mitotic and meiotic chromosome dynamics (Kleckner 1995, Marko & Siggia 1997, Kleckner et al 2004.…”
Section: Chromosome-stretching Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DNA tension is physiologically relevant because pulling of chromatin is likely to occur in vivo, given the large forces that can be produced by RNA polymerase (Yin et al, 1995;Wang et al, 1998), and DNA polymerase (Maier et al, 2000). Tension in chromatin has been suggested to play a role in regulation of various aspects of chromosome dynamics (Marko and Siggia, 1997a, b;Kleckner et al, 2004), via mechanisms including force-driven modification of chromatin structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DNA tension is physiologically relevant because pulling of chromatin is likely to occur in vivo, given the large forces that can be produced by RNA polymerase (Yin et al, 1995;Wang et al, 1998), and DNA polymerase (Maier et al, 2000). Tension in chromatin has been suggested to play a role in regulation of various aspects of chromosome dynamics (Marko and Siggia, 1997a, b;Kleckner et al, 2004), via mechanisms including force-driven modification of chromatin structure.The concept underlying force-extension studies of chromatin assembly and disassembly is sketched roughly in Figure 1, applied to the example of the nucleosome core histone octamer. Force applied to the DNA favors nucleosome disassembly, because this liberates wrapped DNA of length l (expected to be ϳ150 base pairs ϭ 50 nm for a whole nucleosome), doing mechanical work equal to the product of force f and l (Marko and Siggia, 1997a).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%