1988
DOI: 10.1016/0370-2693(88)91523-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A measurement of the spin asymmetry and determination of the structure function g1 in deep inelastic muon-proton scattering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
509
4
2

Year Published

1988
1988
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,534 publications
(529 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
14
509
4
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case where the u quark dominates, we get [43]- [45]. The curves correspond to our model predictions at Q 2 = 4GeV 2 .…”
Section: Experimental Tests For Polarized Dissupporting
confidence: 63%
“…In the case where the u quark dominates, we get [43]- [45]. The curves correspond to our model predictions at Q 2 = 4GeV 2 .…”
Section: Experimental Tests For Polarized Dissupporting
confidence: 63%
“…This is much smaller in magnitude than the corresponding number in Ref. [29] as well as the expected value from the Bjorken sum rule (using the EMC's result for the integral of g~i(z) [7,8] We recall that in the calculation of the neutron electric form factor, for example, this is not possible as both effects lead to a negative charge square radius [14,36].…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…In this the nucleon consists of three massless relativistic quarks, carrying its quantum numbers such as its spin and flavor, confined within a finite volume by a "bag" surface. Deep-inelastic scattering within this model has been calculated previously (see [6] [7,8). The European Muon Collaboration (EMC) results indicate that the major part of the proton spin does not seem to be carried by (current) …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The largest amount of discussions have been stimulated by the polarized deep inelastic lepton nucleon scattering (DIS) measurements [1]. These results suggest that the angular momentum of the nucleon is not distributed among its parton constituents in the way expected in naïve quark models.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%