2016
DOI: 10.17736/jowe.2016.asr06
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Measurement-Based Analysis of the Hydrokinetic Energy in the Gulf Stream

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Each of these resource types are distributed globally with riverine energy primarily located in the worlds larger river systems, tidal energy along the coast and primarily at higher latitudes, and ocean current energy primarily along the western boundaries of the world's oceans. Ocean currents with average energy densities greater than 0.5 kW/m 2 are located at numerous locations along the western boundaries of the world's ocean basins [1], with average energy densities measured in excess of 3.0 kW/m 2 [2]. The technically extractable average ocean current energy from US waters has been estimated at 19 GW [3], with several other countries such as Japan, South Africa, Taiwan, the Philippines, and Brazil also having large scale ocean currents accessible off their coasts [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each of these resource types are distributed globally with riverine energy primarily located in the worlds larger river systems, tidal energy along the coast and primarily at higher latitudes, and ocean current energy primarily along the western boundaries of the world's oceans. Ocean currents with average energy densities greater than 0.5 kW/m 2 are located at numerous locations along the western boundaries of the world's ocean basins [1], with average energy densities measured in excess of 3.0 kW/m 2 [2]. The technically extractable average ocean current energy from US waters has been estimated at 19 GW [3], with several other countries such as Japan, South Africa, Taiwan, the Philippines, and Brazil also having large scale ocean currents accessible off their coasts [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ocean velocity field varies both with time and 3-D space. However, moored OCTs can primarily vary their vertical location and current shear is most prominent in the [26]. The ocean shear profile of these data with 4-hour intervals for one sample day is shown in Fig.…”
Section: A Statistical Ocean Current Shear Profile Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the ocean velocity's dependence on both time and water depth is of primary importance, in other words the ocean velocity should be determined at specific times t and operating depths z. In this paper, we use the data recorded in Southeast Florida by a bottom mounted acoustic Doppler current profile (ADCP) between February 2009 and March 2010 [23]. The ocean shear profile of these data with 4-hour intervals for one sample day is shown in Fig.…”
Section: A Statistical Ocean Current Shear Profile Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%