Abstract:Performance measurement is a key issue when a company is designing new strategies to improve resource allocation. This paper offers a new methodology inspired by classic importance-performance analysis (IPA) that provides a global index of importance versus performance for firms. This index compares two rankings of the same set of features regarding importance and performance, taking into account underperforming features. The marginal contribution of each feature to the proposed global index defines a set of i… Show more
“…After computing the two different, independent, values of Economic performance and Strategic importance for each alternative, an IOWA-based operator, presented in [5], is adopted to retrieve a global evaluation index for the portfolio: the G -index. The objective of this index is to provide a global score of importance vs performance status of the whole portfolio, with a focus on under-performing alternatives.…”
“…• {u 1 ,..., u n } is the order-inducing variable of the IOWA operator • {x 1 ,..., x n } is the argument variable of the IOWA operator • σ : {1,...,n} → {1,...,n} is a permutation such that u σ (i) ≥ u σ (i+1) for i = 1,...,n − 1 • {w 1 ,...,w n } is the set of weights such that w i ∈ [0, 1] and ∑ n i=1 w i = 1. In this specific case, and as employed in [5], n is the number of alternatives considered whilst u i and x i are replaced by p j and i j , respectively.…”
Prioritization of activities is one of the many facets in digital products management. In this study, we propose an alternative point of view on Portofolio Projects Management, in order better understand their relationship between performance and importance and how resources can be allocated taking into account these two categories. An application of the presented methodology to a real use case in the Digital Department of SEAT S.A. is discussed to show current results and future developments.
“…After computing the two different, independent, values of Economic performance and Strategic importance for each alternative, an IOWA-based operator, presented in [5], is adopted to retrieve a global evaluation index for the portfolio: the G -index. The objective of this index is to provide a global score of importance vs performance status of the whole portfolio, with a focus on under-performing alternatives.…”
“…• {u 1 ,..., u n } is the order-inducing variable of the IOWA operator • {x 1 ,..., x n } is the argument variable of the IOWA operator • σ : {1,...,n} → {1,...,n} is a permutation such that u σ (i) ≥ u σ (i+1) for i = 1,...,n − 1 • {w 1 ,...,w n } is the set of weights such that w i ∈ [0, 1] and ∑ n i=1 w i = 1. In this specific case, and as employed in [5], n is the number of alternatives considered whilst u i and x i are replaced by p j and i j , respectively.…”
Prioritization of activities is one of the many facets in digital products management. In this study, we propose an alternative point of view on Portofolio Projects Management, in order better understand their relationship between performance and importance and how resources can be allocated taking into account these two categories. An application of the presented methodology to a real use case in the Digital Department of SEAT S.A. is discussed to show current results and future developments.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.