The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2015
DOI: 10.1007/s00500-015-1696-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A measure of perceived performance to assess resource allocation

Abstract: Performance measurement is a key issue when a company is designing new strategies to improve resource allocation. This paper offers a new methodology inspired by classic importance-performance analysis (IPA) that provides a global index of importance versus performance for firms. This index compares two rankings of the same set of features regarding importance and performance, taking into account underperforming features. The marginal contribution of each feature to the proposed global index defines a set of i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After computing the two different, independent, values of Economic performance and Strategic importance for each alternative, an IOWA-based operator, presented in [5], is adopted to retrieve a global evaluation index for the portfolio: the G -index. The objective of this index is to provide a global score of importance vs performance status of the whole portfolio, with a focus on under-performing alternatives.…”
Section: Preliminars: Theoretical Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…After computing the two different, independent, values of Economic performance and Strategic importance for each alternative, an IOWA-based operator, presented in [5], is adopted to retrieve a global evaluation index for the portfolio: the G -index. The objective of this index is to provide a global score of importance vs performance status of the whole portfolio, with a focus on under-performing alternatives.…”
Section: Preliminars: Theoretical Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• {u 1 ,..., u n } is the order-inducing variable of the IOWA operator • {x 1 ,..., x n } is the argument variable of the IOWA operator • σ : {1,...,n} → {1,...,n} is a permutation such that u σ (i) ≥ u σ (i+1) for i = 1,...,n − 1 • {w 1 ,...,w n } is the set of weights such that w i ∈ [0, 1] and ∑ n i=1 w i = 1. In this specific case, and as employed in [5], n is the number of alternatives considered whilst u i and x i are replaced by p j and i j , respectively.…”
Section: Preliminars: Theoretical Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%