2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.imavis.2013.12.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A measure of information gained through biometric systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
48
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, it is not straightforward to obtain a precise estimate of individuality of the IrisCode representation using the above result because it fails to take into account the genuine score distribution (consequently, intra-subject variations are not modeled). A simple extension of the above approach is to measure the relative entropy between genuine and impostor match score distributions [45]. But this approach may grossly underestimate the entropy of the biometric features and the resulting entropy estimates should be considered as a very loose lower bound.…”
Section: ) Biometric Entropy Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, it is not straightforward to obtain a precise estimate of individuality of the IrisCode representation using the above result because it fails to take into account the genuine score distribution (consequently, intra-subject variations are not modeled). A simple extension of the above approach is to measure the relative entropy between genuine and impostor match score distributions [45]. But this approach may grossly underestimate the entropy of the biometric features and the resulting entropy estimates should be considered as a very loose lower bound.…”
Section: ) Biometric Entropy Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [20], [21], a biometric information measure based on relative entropy is proposed. However, in this case, biometric information measure considers inter-user distance and intrauser distance distributions rather than using feature distributions directly.…”
Section: B Relative Entropymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, while the biometric information measured for face images using effective keyspace (as introduced in [15]) is about 2.6 bits, biometric feature information of face for different feature representations is found to be 35 ∼ 55 bits [4]. On the other hand, in [21], authors reported the biometric system entropy for face is about 12.6 bits. It can be seen that biometric information measured using various methods reported in literature are not only different, but also their findings vary widely.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Kenta Takahashi, et al, [6] presented an article on a measure of information gained through biometric matching systems. In this paper, they discussed how the information about the identity of an individual is obtained from biometric samples through the biometric systems and how to evaluate the Biometric System Entropy based on the mutual information.…”
Section: Iintroductionmentioning
confidence: 99%