2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.cie.2022.107949
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Mean-Variance robust model to minimize operational risk and supply chain cost under aleatory uncertainty: A real-life case application in petroleum supply chain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this regard, improvement actions that could reduce the potential environmental impact include increasing the consumption of grass silage instead of maize silage and lowering the use of concentrates or using locally produced concentrates instead of imported ones [26]. Therefore, a revision of the supply chain is strongly recommended to maintain cost control in case of fluctuating prices of international logistics [52] and to secure the consistency of supplies in uncertain international conditions, as we are experiencing in relationship with the COVID-19 crisis [53]. This would allow keeping the commitment to the SDGs by securing food supply chains (SDG 2) and improving working conditions (SDG 8) as well as the sustainability of production and consumption modes (SDG 9), with the overarching aim of reaching the climate goals (SDG 13), regardless of contingent factors [54].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this regard, improvement actions that could reduce the potential environmental impact include increasing the consumption of grass silage instead of maize silage and lowering the use of concentrates or using locally produced concentrates instead of imported ones [26]. Therefore, a revision of the supply chain is strongly recommended to maintain cost control in case of fluctuating prices of international logistics [52] and to secure the consistency of supplies in uncertain international conditions, as we are experiencing in relationship with the COVID-19 crisis [53]. This would allow keeping the commitment to the SDGs by securing food supply chains (SDG 2) and improving working conditions (SDG 8) as well as the sustainability of production and consumption modes (SDG 9), with the overarching aim of reaching the climate goals (SDG 13), regardless of contingent factors [54].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…26 Supply chain performance indicator items were all adapted from existing measurement scales. 38,53,54,55 Only validated measurement scales (with a minimum Cronbach's alpha of 0.7) were adapted for this study. Five-point Likert scales ranging from 1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree were used as the response option on measurement scales.…”
Section: Instrumentation and Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the 500 questionnaires, 411 valid questionnaires were available for use in the ultimate analysis, signifying a response rate of 82.2%, which is echoed by several suitable studies. 54,55,56…”
Section: Response Rate and Demographic Profile Of Respondentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Song et al [17] compared the impact of riskaverse retailers and overconfident manufacturers on the optimal decisions and profits of participants under the push strategy, pull strategy and other strategy in the uncertain demand environment. Tarei et al [18] analyzed the impact of different risk preferences of decision makers on supply chain costs in a stochastic uncertain environment and constructed a mean-variance robust optimization model. Zhao et al [19] used a joint contract consisting of revenue sharing and repurchase to coordinate supply chains with a risk-averse retailer under demand uncertainty, and showed that a joint contract can achieve higher supply chain revenue compared to a single revenue sharing or repurchase contract.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%