2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00205-017-1125-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Mean Field Limit for the Vlasov–Poisson System

Abstract: We present a probabilistic proof of the mean field limit and propagation of chaos N -particle systems in three dimensions with positive (Coulomb) or negative (Newton) 1/r potentials scaling like 1/N and an N -dependent cut-off which scales like N −1/3+ǫ . In particular, for typical initial data, we show convergence of the empirical distributions to solutions of the Vlasov-Poisson system with either repulsive electrical or attractive gravitational interactions.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
97
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
97
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [16], the mean field limit has been established for interaction potentials with a singularity at the origin that is weaker than that of the Coulomb potential. Another approach to the mean field limit in the case of singular interaction involves a truncated variant of the potential with a cutoff parameter η ≡ η(N ) > 0 assumed to vanish as the number of particles N → ∞: see [16,18,19] for the most recent results in that direction. This cutoff parameter can be thought of as being of the order of the size of the interacting particles, as explained in [18].…”
Section: Statement Of the Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In [16], the mean field limit has been established for interaction potentials with a singularity at the origin that is weaker than that of the Coulomb potential. Another approach to the mean field limit in the case of singular interaction involves a truncated variant of the potential with a cutoff parameter η ≡ η(N ) > 0 assumed to vanish as the number of particles N → ∞: see [16,18,19] for the most recent results in that direction. This cutoff parameter can be thought of as being of the order of the size of the interacting particles, as explained in [18].…”
Section: Statement Of the Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The identity (19) can be used as a definition of the first and second marginals of π in (18). Finally, we recall the definition of the MongeKantorovich distance of exponent p ≥ 1 on and let f be the solution of the Cauchy problem for the Vlasov equation (5) with initial data f in .…”
Section: The Mean Field Limit In Classical Mechanicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Boers & Pickl (2016) improved the result of Hauray & Jabin (2015) in the sense that the softening length used is of order N − 1 d , but still α has to be strictly smaller than d − 1 (and the Coulomb case is again not included). Recently, Lazarovici (2016); Lazarovici & Pickl (2017) extended the method of Boers & Pickl (2016) to include the Coulomb singularity, in 3 dimensions, aiming at a microscopic derivation of the Vlasov-Poisson dynamics. As in Hauray & Jabin (2015), a strictly positive softening length is needed, at fixed N .…”
Section: A Summary Of Mathematical Results On the Vlasov-poisson Equmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One approach to this question would be to start with a mollified potential, and to remove the mollification as the particle number N → ∞. This is the approach used for instance in [11,15] -see also the references therein. Mollifying the Coulomb potential can be understood in some sense as replacing point particles with spherical particles with some positive radius that vanishes in the large N limit.…”
Section: 4mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This truncation amounts to considering point particle systems so rarefied that the probability of observing such configuration in the spatial domain vanishes as N → ∞. For the mean-field limit in classical mechanics, more satisfying results have been obtained recently, with much more realistic dependence of the particle radius in terms of N (see [11,15,14]). Whether these results can be generalized to the quantum setting considered here remains an open question and would most likely require some additional new ideas.…”
Section: 4mentioning
confidence: 99%