2014
DOI: 10.1007/s10479-014-1654-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A mean-CVaR-skewness portfolio optimization model based on asymmetric Laplace distribution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The conditional value at risk theory (CVaR) is derived from VaR and refers to the conditional mean of loss exceeding VaR, reflecting the average potential loss that may be exceeded by the VaR value. The schematic diagram of CVaR is shown in Figure .…”
Section: Portfolio Optimization Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conditional value at risk theory (CVaR) is derived from VaR and refers to the conditional mean of loss exceeding VaR, reflecting the average potential loss that may be exceeded by the VaR value. The schematic diagram of CVaR is shown in Figure .…”
Section: Portfolio Optimization Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We use Monte Carlo simulation to numerically test the estimation accuracy of our KEM in comparison to the EDM and CFM in CVaR hedge models. Among various probability distributions Zhao et al () argue that the ALD is suitable for describing the leptokurtosis, fat‐tail, and skewness characteristics of the return of a financial asset. In order to obtain the true CVaR under ALD, we first introduce two lemmas as follows.Lemma (Kotz et al ) Suppose that Y = ( Y 1 , Y 2 , … , Y d ) ′ ~ AL d ( μ , ∑) and w is a d × 1 real vector.…”
Section: Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then the random variable w ′ Y ~ AL 1 ( w ′ μ , w ′ ∑ w ). AL d ( μ , ∑) denotes d ‐dimensional ALD with mean μ and covariance matrix ∑ + μμ ′ .Lemma (Zhao et al ) If X ~ AL 1 ( μ , τ 2 ), then the CVaR of random variable X is italicCVaR()X=τk2lnα()1+k2k2+τk2, where k=2τμ+μ2+2τ2.…”
Section: Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rockafellar and Uryasev (2002) studied a broad description of methods for minimizing CVaR and its related optimization problems with CVaR constraints. The mean-CVaR (MC) framework has been investigated in recent research (Agarwal, Naik 2006;Ahmed 2006;Yao et al 2013;Dai, Wen 2014;Zhao et al 2015;Moazeni et al 2016). Roman et al (2007) investigated the mean-variance-CVaR (MVC) optimization model and concluded that the MVC model does not dismiss both MV and MC models but embeds them and that the resulting solutions are efficient for mean-variance-CVaR.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%