2018
DOI: 10.3390/risks6040115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Maximal Tail Dependence-Based Clustering Procedure for Financial Time Series and Its Applications in Portfolio Selection

Abstract: In this paper, we propose a clustering procedure of financial time series according to the coefficient of weak lower-tail maximal dependence (WLTMD). Due to the potential asymmetry of the matrix of WLTMD coefficients, the clustering procedure is based on a generalized weighted cuts method instead of the dissimilarity-based methods. The performance of the new clustering procedure is evaluated by simulation studies. Finally, we illustrate that the optimal mean-variance portfolio constructed based on the resultin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(33 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This might be disconcerting from the practical point of view, and has therefore given rise to the notion of maximum tail dependence (MTD). Liu et al (2018) have adopted this notion in their real data based explorations of a portfolio selection problem initiated by De , who have proposed to cluster financial assets by tail dependence. In Liu et al (2018), the tail dependence coefficient (TDC) used by De is replaced by the MTD coefficient, and the corresponding techniques of clustering are developed and discussed.…”
Section: Liu Et Al (2018)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This might be disconcerting from the practical point of view, and has therefore given rise to the notion of maximum tail dependence (MTD). Liu et al (2018) have adopted this notion in their real data based explorations of a portfolio selection problem initiated by De , who have proposed to cluster financial assets by tail dependence. In Liu et al (2018), the tail dependence coefficient (TDC) used by De is replaced by the MTD coefficient, and the corresponding techniques of clustering are developed and discussed.…”
Section: Liu Et Al (2018)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Liu et al (2018) have adopted this notion in their real data based explorations of a portfolio selection problem initiated by De , who have proposed to cluster financial assets by tail dependence. In Liu et al (2018), the tail dependence coefficient (TDC) used by De is replaced by the MTD coefficient, and the corresponding techniques of clustering are developed and discussed. The obtained results suggest that MTD-based portfolios outperform TDC-based portfolios on avoiding extremely low rates of return.…”
Section: Liu Et Al (2018)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This might be disconcerting from the practical point of view, and has therefore given rise to the notion of maximum tail dependence (MTD). Liu et al (2018) have adopted this notion in their real data based explorations of a portfolio selection problem initiated by De Luca and Zuccolotto (2011), who have proposed to cluster financial assets by tail dependence. In Liu et al (2018), the tail dependence coefficient (TDC) used by De Luca and Zuccolotto (2011) is replaced by the MTD coefficient, and the corresponding techniques of clustering are developed and discussed.…”
Section: Liu Et Al (2018)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Liu et al (2018) have adopted this notion in their real data based explorations of a portfolio selection problem initiated by De Luca and Zuccolotto (2011), who have proposed to cluster financial assets by tail dependence. In Liu et al (2018), the tail dependence coefficient (TDC) used by De Luca and Zuccolotto (2011) is replaced by the MTD coefficient, and the corresponding techniques of clustering are developed and discussed. The obtained results suggest that MTD-based portfolios outperform TDC-based portfolios on avoiding extremely low rates of return.…”
Section: Liu Et Al (2018)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is due to the fact that covariance is a measure of portfolio risk based on moments and, as consequence, does not distinguish downside from upside risk. The quantile-based tail measures-value-at-risk (Var), expected shortfall (ES), extreme downside correlations (EDC) and p-tail risk (see, for example (Liu and Wang 2021;Harris et al 2019))-overcome the limitation of covariance in that they are able to capture the downside risk. However, their main drawback is that they are rather insensitive to the shape of the tail distribution since they strongly depend on the a priori choice of the confidence level and/or quantiles, thereby accounting mainly for the frequency of the realizations (not their values) (Kuan et al 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%