“…Faunal remains (animal bones) provide one of the best evidences for animal production, and although there are some complications inherent in interpreting assemblages (Brochier, 2013;Chang & Koster, 1986), distinctions between production systems need to be explored with regional or continental databases (see, e.g., Manning et al, 2013). There is also a need for incorporating cross-disciplinary evidence and methods in order to make reconstructions more robust, for example, combining archeological and paleoecological evidence, and/or using modern analogues to infer past land use (Biagetti, Alcaina-Mateos, & Crema, 2016;Clarke, 2015;Dunne et al, 2012;Ejarque, Miras, & Riera, 2011;Evershed, 2008;Gaillard, Birks, Emanuelsson, & Berglund, 1992;Gifford-Gonzalez, 1991;Graf & Chmura, 2006 Studies of vegetation dynamics are also useful in understanding past land use (Foster, 1992;Foster et al, 2003;Verheyen, Honnay, Motzkin, Hermy, & Foster, 2003), either as a direct indicator of land use (e.g., forest biodiversity: Dupouey, Dambrine, Laffite, & Moares, 2002;Vellend, 2004), or in order to understand vegetation response to a particular type of land use, such as the effects of grazing intensity on grassland plants (Mcintyre & Lavorel, 2001;Noy-Meir, Gutman, & Kaplan, 1989). In addition, studies on chemical soil characteristics may provide insight into past land use, and vice versa (Goodale & Aber, 2001;Verheyen et al, 1999).…”