2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2009.04.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A matter of design: Priming context and person perception

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(34 reference statements)
1
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, primes facilitate the processing of stereotype-consistent compared with stereotype-inconsistent stimuli ( Banaji & Hardin, 1996 ; Blair & Banaji, 1996 ; Devine, 1989 ; Dovidio et al, 1986 ; Kawakami & Dovidio, 2001 ; Macrae & Cloutier, 2009 ; Macrae & Martin, 2007 ; Perdue & Gurtman, 1990 ). Critically, however, many of the studies that purport to demonstrate the automaticity of stereotype activation have used response-priming tasks in which the origins of priming potentially reside in response-related processes (e.g., Blair & Banaji, 1996 ; Kawakami et al, 2000 ; Macrae et al, 2002 ; Macrae & Cloutier, 2009 ; Macrae & Martin, 2007 ). Substantiating this concern, in a response-priming task, here we demonstrated that stereotype-based priming was underpinned by a response bias and not the enhanced processing of stereotype-related material.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Specifically, primes facilitate the processing of stereotype-consistent compared with stereotype-inconsistent stimuli ( Banaji & Hardin, 1996 ; Blair & Banaji, 1996 ; Devine, 1989 ; Dovidio et al, 1986 ; Kawakami & Dovidio, 2001 ; Macrae & Cloutier, 2009 ; Macrae & Martin, 2007 ; Perdue & Gurtman, 1990 ). Critically, however, many of the studies that purport to demonstrate the automaticity of stereotype activation have used response-priming tasks in which the origins of priming potentially reside in response-related processes (e.g., Blair & Banaji, 1996 ; Kawakami et al, 2000 ; Macrae et al, 2002 ; Macrae & Cloutier, 2009 ; Macrae & Martin, 2007 ). Substantiating this concern, in a response-priming task, here we demonstrated that stereotype-based priming was underpinned by a response bias and not the enhanced processing of stereotype-related material.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To investigate stereotype activation, sequential-priming procedures—whereby responses are facilitated when priming stimuli are followed by stereotype-consistent compared with stereotype-inconsistent targets—have been the predominant experimental tool (e.g., Banaji & Hardin, 1996 ; Blair & Banaji, 1996 ; Devine, 1989 ; Dovidio et al, 1986 ; Kawakami & Dovidio, 2001 ; Macrae & Cloutier, 2009 ; Macrae & Martin, 2007 ; Perdue & Gurtman, 1990 ). These priming tasks come in two varieties: response- and semantic-priming paradigms (see Wentura & Degner, 2010 ; Wentura & Rothermund, 2014 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In conclusion, although categorization seems to play a dominant role in person perception processing, a wide range of variables has been shown to function as modulators of categorical thinking activation, including instructions, motivation, goals, and strategies (e.g., Lepore and Brown, 1997 ; Castelli et al, 2004 ; Macrae and Cloutier, 2009 ); the paper by Canadas et al (2013) showed to be a suitable method to investigate these processes. In the current study we aimed at extending this procedure to investigate individuation-categorization processes in a more direct and clear social behavior, the decisions about to trust or not a partner in an economic game.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Similarly, the context can determine whether or not faces are categorized in the first instance. Using a semantic priming paradigm and presenting face primes that were either intermixed or blocked by sex, Macrae and Cloutier (2009) found that category priming effects (i.e., faster categorization of sex‐typical names following same‐sex than opposite‐sex face primes) emerged only when the context highlighted sex as a categorical dimension—that is, when female and male face primes were intermixed.…”
Section: The Social‐cognitive Dynamics Of Face Perceptionmentioning
confidence: 99%