2007
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604125
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A mathematical modelling tool for predicting survival of individual patients following resection of glioblastoma: a proof of principle

Abstract: The prediction of the outcome of individual patients with glioblastoma would be of great significance for monitoring responses to therapy. We hypothesise that, although a large number of genetic-metabolic abnormalities occur upstream, there are two 'final common pathways' dominating glioblastoma growth -net rates of proliferation (r) and dispersal (D). These rates can be estimated from features of pretreatment MR images and can be applied in a mathematical model to predict tumour growth, impact of extent of tu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
331
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 253 publications
(337 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
4
331
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This model, studied by Swanson et al (2008) (Harpold et al, 2007), has proven to be an accurate predictor of anatomical changes that can be imaged by MRI in individual patients Szeto et al, 2009;Swanson et al, 2003Swanson et al, , 2008Rockne et al, 2009). Further, patient-specific PI model parameters for biological aggressiveness (D and ρ) can be estimated from routinely available pre-treatment MRIs (Harpold et al, 2007).…”
Section: Patient-specific Mathematical Modelling Of Gbm: Proliferatiomentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This model, studied by Swanson et al (2008) (Harpold et al, 2007), has proven to be an accurate predictor of anatomical changes that can be imaged by MRI in individual patients Szeto et al, 2009;Swanson et al, 2003Swanson et al, , 2008Rockne et al, 2009). Further, patient-specific PI model parameters for biological aggressiveness (D and ρ) can be estimated from routinely available pre-treatment MRIs (Harpold et al, 2007).…”
Section: Patient-specific Mathematical Modelling Of Gbm: Proliferatiomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, patient-specific PI model parameters for biological aggressiveness (D and ρ) can be estimated from routinely available pre-treatment MRIs (Harpold et al, 2007). These patient-specific proliferation and invasion kinetic rates are prognostic of survival ) and response to therapy (Swanson et al, 2003(Swanson et al, , 2008Rockne et al, 2009) in individual patients. Although the PI model has been validated on both the population and patient-specific levels, it provides limited insight with regard to tumour activity at the molecular level.…”
Section: Patient-specific Mathematical Modelling Of Gbm: Proliferatiomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model assumes that changes of the core (visible in T1c) will occur within the larger edema regions (visible in T2 or FLAIR) and, hence, to only have class transitions from healthy to edema and from edema to core. As the tumor grows steadily [1,18], we can assume that negative volume changes stem from imaging artifacts. To this end we model the tumor volume to be either stable, regularizing the segmentation along time and suppressing noise, or to expand between any two time points.…”
Section: Application 2: Growing Tumor In 3d Medical Scansmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results quantitatively confirm that gliomas always diffuse and cannot be cured by resection alone, surgically or radiologically, irrespective of the degree of malignancy. The developments of this model have proved medically illuminating and clinically practical [11,18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequent studies [13][14][15][16][17][18] refined the model for anatomically correct brains and certain predictions were confirmed by scans and often by autopsy. The results quantitatively confirm that gliomas always diffuse and cannot be cured by resection alone, surgically or radiologically, irrespective of the degree of malignancy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%