2012
DOI: 10.1007/s00701-012-1371-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A mathematical model of utility for single screening of asymptomatic unruptured intracranial aneurysms at the age of 50 years

Abstract: The QALY benefit and cost-effectiveness of screening are most sensitive to the 5-year risk of rupture. Screening is beneficial only in populations with a high risk of rupture; this should be the focus of future research.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In family members with 1 affected first-degree relative, screening compared with no screening had an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $56 500 per QALY. 189 Finally, Li and colleagues 190 examined various screening models of the asymptomatic general population. Overall, screening resulted in a QALY loss, which equated to a negative clinical impact.…”
Section: Cost-effectiveness Of Screeningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In family members with 1 affected first-degree relative, screening compared with no screening had an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $56 500 per QALY. 189 Finally, Li and colleagues 190 examined various screening models of the asymptomatic general population. Overall, screening resulted in a QALY loss, which equated to a negative clinical impact.…”
Section: Cost-effectiveness Of Screeningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the high sensitivity and specificity provided by these advanced brain‐imaging methods, they are costly and include the risk of complications associated with contrast media or repeated exposure to radiation. In a mathematical analysis, MRA screening of asymptomatic patients was shown to be cost‐effective only when the 5‐year risk of rupture was higher than 13%, as this risk level balanced the cost of MRA and subsequent transarterial embolization for patients with an indication for therapy with the cost of medical care caused by a ruptured aneurysm . In comparison, transcranial Doppler/color‐coded carotid duplex imaging has the advantage of a relatively lower cost in screening aneurysms in the general population than MRA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a mathematical analysis, MRA screening of asymptomatic patients was shown to be costeffective only when the 5-year risk of rupture was higher than 13%, as this risk level balanced the cost of MRA and subsequent transarterial embolization for patients with an indication for therapy with the cost of medical care caused by a ruptured aneurysm. 7 In comparison, transcranial Doppler/color-coded carotid duplex imaging has the advantage of a relatively lower cost in screening aneurysms in the general population than MRA. Although direct transcranial Doppler visualization of aneurysms has been reported to have sensitivity of 73% to 78% in some cohorts, the technique is relatively operator dependent, and the sensitivity for aneurysms smaller than 5 mm is poor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations