IntroductionIn a seated posture, humans are most sensitive to whole-body vibrations under low-frequency excitation; therefore, biodynamic responses of a seated human body when exposed to vertical vibrations have attracted much attention through the years. Moreover, knowledge of the human responses to vibrations requires an understanding the cause-effect relationships among the transmission of vibrations through the body and its health, comfort and performance. These responses have been widely assessed in terms of seat-to-head (STH) transmissibility, drivingpoint mechanical (DPM) impedance, and apparent (AP) mass. The first function refers to the transmission of motion through the body; whereas the other two pertain to the force and motion at the point of vibration input.The human body is a very sophisticated dynamic system whose mechanical properties vary from one moment to another and from one individual to another. From the results of a large amount of experimental data, various biodynamic models have been developed to describe human motion. According to different techniques, these models can be grouped as lumped-parameter (LP), finiteelement (FE), and multibody (MB) models.An LP model consists of lumped masses, springs and dashpots [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] . A variety of experiments have also been implemented by various researchers under widely varying testing conditions, involving vibration excitations, postural constraints, and subject populations. These have, therefore, resulted in significant variations between the different data sets generated. In an effort to define generalized values for characterizing the biodynamic responses of a seated body in the most commonly encountered work environments, Boileau et al.