2011
DOI: 10.17221/38/2010-rae
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A mathematical model for predicting the cracking efficiency of vertical-shaft centrifugal palm nut cracker

Abstract: Ndukwu M.C., Asoegwu S.N., 2011. A mathematical model for predicting the cracking efficiency of verticalshaft centrifugal palm nut cracker. Res. Agr. Eng., 57: 110-115.A mathematical model for predicting the cracking efficiency of vertical-shaft palm nut cracker was presented using dimensional analysis based on the Buckingham's π theorem. A high coefficient of determination of 94.3% between the predicted and measured values showed that the method is good. The model was validated with data from existing palm nu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…When the mean of experimental and predicted values are compared using a multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) at a 5% level of significance, there was no statistical difference since the calculated value is less than the P-value. The obtained results are similar to that reported by Ndukwu and Asoegwu (2011), who observed no significance difference in the mean of the predicted and experimental values as compared using the least significance difference (LSD) at a 1% and 5% level of significance.…”
supporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…When the mean of experimental and predicted values are compared using a multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) at a 5% level of significance, there was no statistical difference since the calculated value is less than the P-value. The obtained results are similar to that reported by Ndukwu and Asoegwu (2011), who observed no significance difference in the mean of the predicted and experimental values as compared using the least significance difference (LSD) at a 1% and 5% level of significance.…”
supporting
confidence: 89%
“…Having selected (ω), (F) and (λ) as the recurring sets, the exponents a, b and c are placed on them, respectively, so that when their product ω a F b λ c is divided by the remaining parameters t p , τ and t ct , the dimensionless group(s) π 1 , π 2 and π 3 are obtained as shown in Equation (3-5) (Ndirika 2006;Simonyan et al 2006;Asoegwu et al 2010;Ndukwu and Asoegwu 2011).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The machine capacity, chipping efficiency, throughput capacity and feeding rate were computed using the following Equations ( 1) -(4) (Ndukwu and Asoegwu, 2010;Ndukwu and Asoegwu, 2011;Akintunde andAkintunde, 2001 Igboayaka et al, 2018):…”
Section: Performance Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It helps in the elimination of wastage in the design and results testing [5]. Several researchers have established many models which could find application in food and crop processing / process optimization as well as equipment development [6,7,8,9,10,11,12,5]. Thus, the main objective of this research was to establish a model that could be used in estimating Taro Cocoyam volume with respect to its axial dimensions for efficient development of storage system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%