2015
DOI: 10.1007/s11538-015-0076-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Mathematical Framework for Understanding Four-Dimensional Heterogeneous Differentiation of $$\hbox {CD4}^{+}$$ CD4 + T Cells

Abstract: At least four distinct lineages of CD4+ T cells play diverse roles in the immune system. Both in vivo and in vitro, naïve CD4+ T cells often differentiate into a variety of cellular phenotypes. Previously, we developed a mathematical framework to study heterogeneous differentiation of two lineages governed by a mutual-inhibition motif. To understand heterogeneous differentiation of CD4+ T cells involving more than two lineages, we present here a mathematical framework for the analysis of multiple stable steady… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Multiple intermediate cell states may arise from complex gene regulatory networks with interconnected positive feedback loops [12] [13]. It is conceivable that the formation of more intermediate cells would require more complex gene regulatory networks, which in turn need some other strategies and/or more energy to control.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Multiple intermediate cell states may arise from complex gene regulatory networks with interconnected positive feedback loops [12] [13]. It is conceivable that the formation of more intermediate cells would require more complex gene regulatory networks, which in turn need some other strategies and/or more energy to control.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, the parent vector x is replaced by the offspring vector u in the next generation. The DE algorithm was previously shown to be efficient in optimizing models for biological systems [13]. With this algorithm, we iteratively searched for a newer set of parameter values that provided a better cost to the objective function Φ( x ) than the previous set until the cost converged to the most optimal value.…”
Section: Mathematical Models and Stochastic Simulation Of Multiplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advantage of such metrics is that the scoring is robust to the change of individual genes. However, performing clustering on cells based on low-dimensional scores has the disadvantage of missing useful information in high-dimensional gene expression space, which has even greater potentials to reveal multiple attractors (77). This can be seen in part in the scores of E and M gene subclusters, in that the initial increase in E score during the time course appears to be driven by a specific subset of epithelial genes with distinct regulation by EMT factors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple runs of optimization using differential evolution algorithm was used, and 500 converged parameter sets for each circuit were used for comparison. This optimization method was previously used for finding optimum parameter sets and for comparing the performances of regulatory circuits [58,101,102].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%