2005
DOI: 10.1109/tbme.2005.845045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A mathematical analysis of SFAP convolutional models

Abstract: In this paper we compare, from a mathematical point of view, two well-recognized single fiber action potential (SFAP) convolutional models: the Nandedkar-Stalberg (N-S) model and the Dimitrov-Dimitrova (D-D) model. Junction waves appear in N-S SFAPs due to the onset and extinction of the monopoles whereas in D-D SFAPs these waves appear only when the dipoles reach the fiber/tendon junctions. D-D junction waves model more accurately the out-of-the-main-spike waveforms that appear in experimental SFAPs. The orig… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More specifically, the non-propagating component can be seen to arise from a stationary source located at a fixed location, the fiber-tendon junction. Therefore, positional changes of this junction relative to the recording electrode alter the magnitude of the whole end-of-fiber component [ 13 ]. Conversely, the propagating component results from the propagation of the action potential along the muscle fiber.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More specifically, the non-propagating component can be seen to arise from a stationary source located at a fixed location, the fiber-tendon junction. Therefore, positional changes of this junction relative to the recording electrode alter the magnitude of the whole end-of-fiber component [ 13 ]. Conversely, the propagating component results from the propagation of the action potential along the muscle fiber.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Discrepancies in the extent of potentiation between Ampli-FIRST and Ampli SECOND might be related to the fact that the M-wave first phase results from the propagation of the excitation source along the fiber, whereas the second phase mainly reflects the extinction of this source at the aponeurosis/tendon (15). Therefore, if changes in muscle architecture had persisted for a few seconds after the contraction, these changes would have influenced the M-wave second phase to a greater degree compared with the first phase (35,37).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the signal characteristics at the wrist are different than that at the belly of the muscle. The electric potentials recorded at the wrist are end-of-fiber components (25), which are non-propagating potentials highly synchronized across channels (as shown in Fig. 2d) and shorter in time than the propagating signals recorded from muscles (43).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Each motoneuron discharge generates an electric field transmitted through the tendon tissue that can be distinguished from the fields generated by other motoneurons. The biophysical properties of electric potentials recorded over tendon tissues are known (25)(26)(27)(28), but these signals have not previously been used to identify individual motoneuron discharges. Here we propose an innovative interface that decodes spinal motoneuron discharges from tendon electric signals at the wrist to develop a non-invasive, unobtrusive, and socially acceptable wearable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%