Advances in the Preclinical Study of Ischemic Stroke 2012
DOI: 10.5772/32327
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Master Key to Assess Stroke Consequences Across Species: The Adhesive Removal Test

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the adhesive removal tests sensorimotor functions and sensory asymmetries can be measured [ 45 ]. In the control group the average time to remove each piece of tape was 15.2 ± 1.3 s ( Figure 5 d).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the adhesive removal tests sensorimotor functions and sensory asymmetries can be measured [ 45 ]. In the control group the average time to remove each piece of tape was 15.2 ± 1.3 s ( Figure 5 d).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The delicate manipulations of the forelimbs important for the normal life of rodents were analyzed using the sunflower seed task, vermicelli handling test, and the adhesive test, indicative of sensory and motor abilities of the forelimbs, tongue, and jaw [ 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 ]. In hHcy rats impaired manipulation of small objects (seeds, vermicelli) and slowing of the manipulation rate (adhesive test and seed task) was observed which may result from dysfunctions of cortex and subcortical areas responsible for the fine motor control and sensory feedback as also observed in Parkinson disease, cerebral ischemia, or craniocerebral injury [ 44 , 64 , 65 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The adhesive removal test is very relevant in linking experimental and clinical stroke, as it was originally based on the double simultaneous stimulation examination of contralateral neglect [ 74 , 75 ]. Furthermore, it has been used across multiple species, namely mice, rats, gerbils and marmosets [ 20 , 23 , 24 , 76 , 77 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some such tests include composite scores of general welfare such as the Benderson Neurological Scoring Scales, the Modified Neurological Severity Scores (Bederson et al 1986; Zhang et al 2002), and tests for cognitive deficits such as the Modified Morris Water Maze and the Radial Arm Maze (Volpe et al 1984; Schallert 2006). Furthermore, a battery of tests have been developed to measure sensorimotor deficits, some of which are specific for forelimb use, such as: the Cylinder Test, the Reaching Pellet Retrieval Task, the Staircase Test, the Vibrissae Elicited Forelimb Placing Test, the Corner Test, the Accelerated Rotarod Test and the Adhesive Removal Test (Schallert et al 2000, 1982; Montoya et al 1991; Markgraf et al 1992; Baird et al 2001; Chen et al 2001; Gharbawie et al 2004; Schallert 2006; Allred and Jones 2008; Allred et al 2008; Bouet and Freret 2012); and others that are specific for hindlimb use, such as: the Grid Walking Test, the Ledged Tapered Beam Test and the Ladder Rung Walking Test (Metz and Whishaw 2002; Schallert and Woodlee 2005; Allred and Jones 2008). While it is apparent that there are various tests measuring deficits in forelimb use, there are far fewer tests that measure hindlimb functionality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%