2021
DOI: 10.1007/jhep06(2021)185
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A master exceptional field theory

Abstract: We construct a pseudo-Lagrangian that is invariant under rigid E11 and transforms as a density under E11 generalised diffeomorphisms. The gauge-invariance requires the use of a section condition studied in previous work on E11 exceptional field theory and the inclusion of constrained fields that transform in an indecomposable E11-representation together with the E11 coset fields. We show that, in combination with gauge-invariant and E11-invariant duality equations, this pseudo-Lagrangian reduces to the bosonic… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 164 publications
(549 reference statements)
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We expect the other kinematic constraints (diffeomorphism and Gauss-type) appearing in field theory to play a crucial role in this. However, their final significance in our present approach is not clear and might necessitate the introduction of extra fields beyond the E 10 /K(E 10 ) symmetric space, in the same way that they appear in exceptional field theory [17][18][19]. A further indication of the need for extra degrees of freedom is the apparent incompatibility of the full E 10 /K(E 10 ) model with supersymmetry [20,21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We expect the other kinematic constraints (diffeomorphism and Gauss-type) appearing in field theory to play a crucial role in this. However, their final significance in our present approach is not clear and might necessitate the introduction of extra fields beyond the E 10 /K(E 10 ) symmetric space, in the same way that they appear in exceptional field theory [17][18][19]. A further indication of the need for extra degrees of freedom is the apparent incompatibility of the full E 10 /K(E 10 ) model with supersymmetry [20,21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Furthermore, it seems doubtful that the discrepancies arising at levels |ℓ| ≥ 3 can be resolved purely within the framework of E 10 alone, as already suggested by the absence of the trace of the spin connection. It has been argued from the point of view of exceptional field theory and the tensor hierarchy algebra that an appropriate extension of the E 10 coset will involve an indecomposable structure where E 10 is augmented by highest weight representations where the first one is triggered by the trace of the spin connection [24, 19,25], a fact that is also suggested by compatibility with supersymmetry [20,61].…”
Section: Canonical Quantisation: a New Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Evidently, for any given E d(d) ExFT, one can construct or imagine multiple other 'hybrid' formulations depending on how one chooses to separate or mix the longitudinal and transverse directions. More ambitiously, one could choose to work with the recently fully constructed 'master' E 11 ExFT [55], for which no coordinate decomposition is necessary. Evidently this would eschew the technical difficulties of the latter in favour of the technicalities associated to working with an infinite-dimensional algebra.…”
Section: Exceptional Field Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beyond the usual suspects, exceptional field theory also offers a way to handle the vast number of mixed symmetry tensors that appear coupling to exotic branes [60,61]. It may not be unreasonable to suggest using the E 11 'master' ExFT recently constructed in [55], as this presumably provides scope to construct an infinite number of brane scaling limits. Here there is no need to artificially split the coordinates and one can work with 11/10-dimensional quantities throughout, albeit at the obvious price of dealing with a very infinite algebra.…”
Section: Jhep10(2021)015mentioning
confidence: 99%