2019
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stz1456
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A massive cluster at z = 0.288 caught in the process of formation: The case of Abell 959

Abstract: The largest galaxy clusters are observed still to be forming through major clustercluster mergers, often showing observational signatures such as radio relics and giant radio haloes. Using LOFAR Two-meter Sky Survey data, we present new detections of both a radio halo (with a spectral index of α 1400 143 = 1.48 +0.06 −0.23 ) and a likely radio relic in Abell 959, a massive cluster at a redshift of z = 0.288. Using a sample of clusters with giant radio haloes from the literature (80 in total), we show that the … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 195 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using the measurement in Table 3, we estimate the X-ray luminosity for the cluster system to be L cex = (2.6 +0.4 −0.3 ) × 10 44 erg s −1 . We compare our measurements for the cluster system eFEDS J093513.3+004746 and eFEDS J093510.7+004910 with those for 94 clusters (of which 13 lack a radio halo detection) presented in Bîrzan et al (2019). Figure 10 shows that our measurements slightly deviate from those for the known radio halos and from the best-fit relation that is obtained for 25 clusters in Cassano et al (2013).…”
Section: The Scaling Relation P 14 Ghz -L 500mentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Using the measurement in Table 3, we estimate the X-ray luminosity for the cluster system to be L cex = (2.6 +0.4 −0.3 ) × 10 44 erg s −1 . We compare our measurements for the cluster system eFEDS J093513.3+004746 and eFEDS J093510.7+004910 with those for 94 clusters (of which 13 lack a radio halo detection) presented in Bîrzan et al (2019). Figure 10 shows that our measurements slightly deviate from those for the known radio halos and from the best-fit relation that is obtained for 25 clusters in Cassano et al (2013).…”
Section: The Scaling Relation P 14 Ghz -L 500mentioning
confidence: 73%
“…angle (Skillman et al 2013). This has been seen in a few clusters, for example, Abell 959 (Bîrzan et al 2019), Abell 2255 (Akamatsu et al 2016), and MACS J0717.5+3745 (Bonafede et al 2009).…”
Section: Macs J05534-3342mentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Most systems were observed as part of LoTSS, the LOFAR Two-meter Sky Survey (Shimwell et al 2019), and for 8 h of total integration time, except for the lower declination systems that were observed for 4 h (see Table 2). 3 The PREFACTOR 4 and FACTOR pipelines 5 were used to calibrate and image the data using the facet-calibration scheme described in van Weeren et al 2016, following the process detailed in Bîrzan et al (2019). Version 2.0.2 of PREFACTOR and version 1.3 of FACTOR were used.…”
Section: Lofar Datamentioning
confidence: 99%