2002
DOI: 10.1090/s0025-5718-02-01455-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A mass formula for unimodular lattices with no roots

Abstract: Abstract. We derive a mass formula for n-dimensional unimodular lattices having any prescribed root system. We use Katsurada's formula for the Fourier coefficients of Siegel Eisenstein series to compute these masses for all root systems of even unimodular 32-dimensional lattices and odd unimodular lattices of dimension n ≤ 30. In particular, we find the mass of even unimodular 32-dimensional lattices with no roots, and the mass of odd unimodular lattices with no roots in dimension n ≤ 30, verifying Bacher and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
55
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
55
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This suggests that we look for c = 32 meromorphic theories with a simple level-1 Kac-Moody algebra, and coset them by a Deligne series CFT. From Table 1 of [25] we see that there are indeed lattices having A 1 , A 2 , D 4 , E 6 as their root systems (but curiously not E 7 ). The CFT on these lattices will have an extra U(1) 32−r symmetry.…”
Section: An Example In Detailmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This suggests that we look for c = 32 meromorphic theories with a simple level-1 Kac-Moody algebra, and coset them by a Deligne series CFT. From Table 1 of [25] we see that there are indeed lattices having A 1 , A 2 , D 4 , E 6 as their root systems (but curiously not E 7 ). The CFT on these lattices will have an extra U(1) 32−r symmetry.…”
Section: An Example In Detailmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…4 In the other direction, King [22] classifies all (even) unimodular lattices in dimension 32 with no roots, and finds there to be at least 10 7 such; as the lack of roots implies that the lattices have no vectors of norm 2, it follows that each is extremal. Similarly, Peters [33] shows there are at least 10 51 extremal lattices in dimension 40.…”
Section: Extremal Latticesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However we could show that the Fourier coefficients of 4 (Z, L 32 ) can be made explicit in the sense that if one specified Fourier coefficient of 4 (Z, L 32 ) is obtained then all the Fourier coefficients are in principle computable. One may note that the results in the present paper are free from constructions for the extremal lattices, while the number of non-isometric 32-dimensional even unimodular extremal lattices is at least one billion (King [15,Corollary 17]). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%