2012
DOI: 10.1109/lgrs.2011.2181326
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Markovian Approach for DEM Estimation From Multiple InSAR Data With Atmospheric Contributions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are many ways to obtain DEMs, such as InSAR, photogrammetry and LiDAR [43,44,[66][67][68]. As an indispensable product in most areas of earth science, the DEM should be chosen carefully in terms of its resolution and accuracy.…”
Section: Selection Of Dem For Inundation Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many ways to obtain DEMs, such as InSAR, photogrammetry and LiDAR [43,44,[66][67][68]. As an indispensable product in most areas of earth science, the DEM should be chosen carefully in terms of its resolution and accuracy.…”
Section: Selection Of Dem For Inundation Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concerning the first step, different techniques can be applied according to the extension and to the topography of the observed scene. The algorithm proposed in [43] has been adopted for Napoli test case, while the algorithm proposed in [44] has been considered for SerrePonçon test case. Concerning the second step, commonly a relative phase calibration is applied based on the identification of high coherence areas or permanent scatters.…”
Section: Application To Satellite Sar Imagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the assumptions of zero ground deformation and statistically independent IFMs, do not always hold true. MAP is characterized by good performances [25], [26]; MAP combined with Markov random fields [29] can recover topographic profiles affected by strong height discontinuities and noise can be rejected efficiently, yet is limited by the heavy computational burden.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%