2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2019.106621
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Markov chains prognostics framework for complex degradation processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This remarkable correlation suggest that the DoH index can be used to predict the crack length in a probabilistic manner. Furthermore, a state-space dynamical system representation of the data will provide a predictive model of the crack length whereby the remaining useful life of the structure can be estimated (see [ 56 ]), using just the DoH as input data. This further development would require the assessment of a higher number of specimens, which would provide additional data to build a robust predictive model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This remarkable correlation suggest that the DoH index can be used to predict the crack length in a probabilistic manner. Furthermore, a state-space dynamical system representation of the data will provide a predictive model of the crack length whereby the remaining useful life of the structure can be estimated (see [ 56 ]), using just the DoH as input data. This further development would require the assessment of a higher number of specimens, which would provide additional data to build a robust predictive model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last decades, a great variety of damage prognosis techniques have been developed in SHM depending on the availability of physics knowledge and data. From the perspective of how the prognosis models are formulated, they can be distinguished into physics-based [1][2][3], data-driven [4][5][6][7][8] and hybrid methods [9][10][11][12][13]. Physics-based methods utilize specific mechanistic knowledge and theories to formulate a pure physics-based model, which describes the structural degradation phenomena as well as the links between the damage states and the SHM measurements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Physics-based methods utilize specific mechanistic knowledge and theories to formulate a pure physics-based model, which describes the structural degradation phenomena as well as the links between the damage states and the SHM measurements. On the other hand, data-driven methods, resorting to datadriven modelling techniques such as neural networks [6] and Markov chains [8], attempt to use amounts of data to build the relationship between the internal degradation behaviour and the external observations. Hybrid methods, taken as a combination of the two above methods, usually consider the physics-based process and data-driven measurement equations to describe the damage evolution and the mapping between the damage state and measurement, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, such methods need to assume prior probability and a life distribution such as a Gaussian or Weibull distribution with a linear relationship. However, for RUL prediction, the relationship between measurements is nonlinear, and the assumed probabilistic distribution contradicts the actual situation (Tang et al, 2019;Chiachío et al, 2020). Also, estimating the transfer probability matrix often require a large amount of training data (Papadopoulos et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%