2002
DOI: 10.1007/s00269-001-0237-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A mapping of the electron localization function for the silica polymorphs: evidence for domains of electron pairs and sites of potential electrophilic attack

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
13
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
3
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proposed incorporation of H in coesite is in accordance with another type of hydrogarnet substitution, with Si T2 being replaced by (OH) 4 . Only the O atoms O2, O3, O4, and O5 are the proton acceptors, and O1 is not involved, which is in agreement with the findings of Gibbs et al (2002). This is the only model that can explain the pleochroic and high-pressure behavior of bands n 7 -n 10 .…”
Section: Figuresupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The proposed incorporation of H in coesite is in accordance with another type of hydrogarnet substitution, with Si T2 being replaced by (OH) 4 . Only the O atoms O2, O3, O4, and O5 are the proton acceptors, and O1 is not involved, which is in agreement with the findings of Gibbs et al (2002). This is the only model that can explain the pleochroic and high-pressure behavior of bands n 7 -n 10 .…”
Section: Figuresupporting
confidence: 88%
“…According to Koch-Müller et al (2001) O2, O3, O4, and O5 are the proton accepting O atoms. This is in excellent agreement with the results of Gibbs et al (2002) based on mapping of the electron localization function for coesite. Although the mechanism of hydrogen incorporation in coesite can be explained by the hydrogarnet substitution, the arrangement of the four OH-groups in the coesite structure is quite different from the arrangement of the OH-groups in garnet.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…8a clearly shows that the surface of the S-TiO 2 was composed of Ti, O, S and C elements. Carbon was ascribed to the residual carbon from the precursor solution and the adventitious hydrocarbon from XPS instrument itself [30,54]. Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ELF slice in Fig. 3 exhibited different character with less localization around O (or S) and the blue areas of zero localization were reduced to the immediate neighborhood of Ti with the remaining interstice areas characterized by free electron gas like behavior [53][54][55]. Additionally, the non-localization area increased with the increase of the dopant concentration till 2.78 at.% of the S doping concentration.…”
Section: Bader Charge Distribution and Elf Analysismentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The calculations show that the bond lengths decrease linearly as the theoretical value of the electron density at the bond critical point, ρ( r c ), increases together with a concomitant increase in the curvatures of the electron density at the point both perpendicular and parallel to the bond path. A mapping of the theoretical Δρ deformation density, the electron localization function, ELF, and the Laplacian −∇ 2 ρ distributions for the silica polymorphs quartz, coesite, and stishovite, have also served to highlight sites of potential chemical reactivity and favorable docking sites for hydrogen in the lone-pair regions of the oxide anions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%