2013
DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2013.869369
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A manufacturing resource allocation method with knowledge-based fuzzy comprehensive evaluation for aircraft structural parts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The assessment for the level of risk perception was set to five levels, namely V 1 (strong) to V 5 (weak). According to the weight calculation step of the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method, the evaluation of the bottom layer index was carried out, followed by the calculation of the target layer weight [47]. The specific calculation was as follows [48].…”
Section: Group Risk Perception Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The assessment for the level of risk perception was set to five levels, namely V 1 (strong) to V 5 (weak). According to the weight calculation step of the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method, the evaluation of the bottom layer index was carried out, followed by the calculation of the target layer weight [47]. The specific calculation was as follows [48].…”
Section: Group Risk Perception Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation [10][11][12] is a very effective decision-making method to make a comprehensive and objective evaluation of things affected by many uncertainties. After summarizing the common operation chains for each machining feature, this paper built a fuzzy comprehensive evaluation model of potential feature operation chains.…”
Section: Modeling Of Fuzzy Evaluation Of An Operation Chainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the procedure of optic camouflage performance assessment, the teacher value is provided by experts' evaluation or other ways. There are several methods of assessment of multiple criteria such as one-nine degree and experts mark, analytical hierarchy process [14], fuzzy comprehensive evaluation [15] method and so on. However, they are sometimes too "subjective".…”
Section: Assessment Index System For Optic Camouflage Performancementioning
confidence: 99%