1996
DOI: 10.1007/s003359900256
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A major polymorphism in the rat SA gene caused by the insertion of a LINE element

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4a). Intron A of the SHR SA gene contains a LINE insertion (19). Aside from a difference in fragment size between SHR and WKY of 1.3 kb with some primer pairs as a consequence of this, we found no other difference to suggest exon duplication at the DNA level in the WKY rat.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…4a). Intron A of the SHR SA gene contains a LINE insertion (19). Aside from a difference in fragment size between SHR and WKY of 1.3 kb with some primer pairs as a consequence of this, we found no other difference to suggest exon duplication at the DNA level in the WKY rat.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Ten YACs encompassing at least 4 Mb were explored and one identified a divergent hybridization pattern in a patient and his mother. The characterization of the molecular mechanism revealed an L1 retrotransposition, located in intron 1 They can occur either as polymorphisms [12][13][14] or as disease-associated rearrangements [15][16][17][18][19][20] in exons and introns. In the spastic and beige mouse mutants, an intronic L1 insertion leads to aberrant splicing of the mature mRNA (refs 18,20).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 Our analysis finds that this difference is sustained across the 3 SHR substrains examined. This gene has been thoroughly studied because of its differential expression, its position in a wellsubstantiated SHR BP QTL, [17][18][19][20][21] evidence of polymorphism in the Sa locus between SHR and WKY, 22,23 and evidence from human studies suggesting involvement in BP determination. 24 -26 Recent rat congenic studies have not found support for the involvement of Sa in BP regulation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%