2013
DOI: 10.1108/jqme-05-2013-0027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A maintenance maturity assessment method for the manufacturing industry

Abstract: PurposeThe paper proposes a maturity assessment method to measure the state of maintenance practices in a company.Design/methodology/approachThe method assumes that a maintenance department is evaluated in terms of its managerial, organizational and technological capabilities. By its adoption it is possible to analyse the maturity level reached by a company, in order to classify the criticalities in its maintenance processes; a company can also make a benchmark with the best companies of a reference sample.Fin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
40
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, it was assumed that only companies with certain level of maturity in Maintenance Managementone of the precursors of AM 15,16 are ready enough to talk about and implement the wider concept of AM. The selection was possible thanks to the survey of the TeSeM observatory made with the purpose to benchmark the maturity in Maintenance Management practices, and counting on a sample of more than 300 companies up to 2015 (the maturity assessment of maintenance management practices adopts the method presented in (Macchi, Fumagalli, 2013) 17 ). The selected companies belong to different industrial sectors in order to avoid biases and to cover a broader scope of the production industry.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, it was assumed that only companies with certain level of maturity in Maintenance Managementone of the precursors of AM 15,16 are ready enough to talk about and implement the wider concept of AM. The selection was possible thanks to the survey of the TeSeM observatory made with the purpose to benchmark the maturity in Maintenance Management practices, and counting on a sample of more than 300 companies up to 2015 (the maturity assessment of maintenance management practices adopts the method presented in (Macchi, Fumagalli, 2013) 17 ). The selected companies belong to different industrial sectors in order to avoid biases and to cover a broader scope of the production industry.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Galar et al (2012) proposed a combined data-mining-based methodology for condition-based maintenance (CBM) considering condition-monitoring (CM) data and Historical Maintenance Management data. Macchi and Fumagalli (2013) measured and checked the performance improvement level of a company's maintenance practices. Mazurkiewicz (2014) studied the reliability of the continuous availability of conveyor belt.…”
Section: 1statement Of the Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three hundred industrial companies in different industrial sectors (mechanical, food, chemical-pharmaceutical and others) and of different sizes (34% SMEs and 66% Big) compose the reference sample. The research is based on a maintenance maturity assessment method developed by the TeSeM and implemented through a questionnaire [14]. The method allows assessing the maintenance maturity both as a synthetic index -in the remainder general maturity index (GMI), for measuring the general Maturity Level (ML) -and a set of component indexes accordingly with the need to measure the managerial, organizational and technological capabilities of the maintenance department.…”
Section: State Of Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…ML5 is the optimizing one (meaning that process is managed by ensuring the continuous improvement; causes of defects and problems in the processes are identified and actions taken in order to prevent problems from occurring in the future) [14]. A general overview regarding the GMI in the Italian industry nowadays is given in Fig.1.…”
Section: State Of Practicementioning
confidence: 99%