2002
DOI: 10.1109/jmems.2002.802899
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A magnetic microstirrer and array for microfluidic mixing

Abstract: We report the development of a micromachined magnetic-bar micromixer for microscale fluid mixing in biological laboratory-on-a-chip applications. The mixer design is inspired by large scale magnetic bar mixers. A rotating magnetic field causes a single magnetic bar or an array of them to rotate rapidly within a fluid environment. A fabrication process of the magnetic bar mixer is developed. Results of fluid mixing in micro channels and chambers are investigated using experimental means and computer-aided fluid… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
47
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 375 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Open-surface micromixers may be of active or passive type, depending on whether external energy input is required or not, respectively. Active micromixer designs for surface microfluidics have recently been adopted by several groups in the community: for example, mixing using electrowetting on dielectric (EWOD) 17 , magnetic 18, 19 , dielectrophoretic 20 , surface acoustic wave (SAW) 21 , or thermocapillary actuation 11 has been found to be effective in controlled manipulation of discrete liquid volumes on solid substrates. However, these devices are complex, since they also include off-chip components ( i .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Open-surface micromixers may be of active or passive type, depending on whether external energy input is required or not, respectively. Active micromixer designs for surface microfluidics have recently been adopted by several groups in the community: for example, mixing using electrowetting on dielectric (EWOD) 17 , magnetic 18, 19 , dielectrophoretic 20 , surface acoustic wave (SAW) 21 , or thermocapillary actuation 11 has been found to be effective in controlled manipulation of discrete liquid volumes on solid substrates. However, these devices are complex, since they also include off-chip components ( i .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to efficiently mix reagents and samples, many active mixers have been designed and tested, such as ultrasonic, 8 magnetic stirring, 9 and bubble-induced acoustic actuation 10 . However, compared to active mixers, passive mixers are preferred due to their low-cost, ease of fabrication, and integration within microfluidics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the latter, the average mixing time τ mix can be calculated using the following equation: τitalicmixx2/D where x is the diffusion length (the distance that the solute needs to travel during the diffusion), and D is the diffusion coefficient. In low Re microfluidic systems, various mixing mechanisms have been demonstrated [17] using active approaches, such as magnetic [18,19], electrokinetic [20], acoustic [2123], optical based [24] as well as passive approaches such as tesla microstructures [25,26], serpentine channels [27], and lamination [28]. These approaches either require an external mechanism to induce mixing or lacks the dynamic control of the fluid interface.…”
Section: Hydrodynamic Focusing (Hf) Devicesmentioning
confidence: 99%