2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2013.12.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A macro-component approach for the assessment of building sustainability in early stages of design

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
36
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
36
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, the early stages of building design, when main decisions are taken, are the stages with the higher influence on the life cycle performance of buildings as suggested by Gervásio et al [221]. However, in these stages, data is often scarce so that LCA approaches are limited.…”
Section: Life Cycle Environmental Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In fact, the early stages of building design, when main decisions are taken, are the stages with the higher influence on the life cycle performance of buildings as suggested by Gervásio et al [221]. However, in these stages, data is often scarce so that LCA approaches are limited.…”
Section: Life Cycle Environmental Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…To overcome this problem, a simplified LCA approach was developed by Gervásio et al [221] to quantify the potential environmental impacts over the life cycle of buildings.…”
Section: Life Cycle Environmental Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…One example is the SB_Tool, also designated as ESSAT (early stage sustainability assessment tool), and developed by SB_Steel research project partners, mainly by the University of Coimbra research team, for the evaluation of the life cycle environmental performance of a building, which is freely available online [10]. This tool was an outcome of the European research project "SB_Steel-Sustainable buildings in steel" [11][12][13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…intention to achieve unsatisfactory results [9]. There may be no assurance for the proposed plan to work 50 effectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%