2022
DOI: 10.1038/s43587-022-00266-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A machine-vision-based frailty index for mice

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Grooming was classified using a action detection network as previously described [35]. Spinal mobility metrics and rearing were derived using the pose estimation data as previously described [54]. Freezing behavior was heuristically derived by taking the average speed of the nose, base of head, and base of tail points at each frame, and finding periods of at least 3 seconds where the average speed of the mouse was less than 0.09 pixels/sec.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Grooming was classified using a action detection network as previously described [35]. Spinal mobility metrics and rearing were derived using the pose estimation data as previously described [54]. Freezing behavior was heuristically derived by taking the average speed of the nose, base of head, and base of tail points at each frame, and finding periods of at least 3 seconds where the average speed of the mouse was less than 0.09 pixels/sec.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We took the averages and inter-quartile ranges for all measures. We previously developed methods for looking at the bend of the spine throughout the video [54]. Briefly, we track the pose coordinates of three points on the mouse at each frame: the back of the head (A), the middle of the back (B), and the base of the tail (C).…”
Section: Pose Estimation and Gaitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Parks et al, 2011). The convenience of the open-field paradigm for analysis of multiple traits has motivated the development of mouse FI versions that rely mostly (Whitehead et al, 2013) or entirely (Hession et al, 2021) on analytics of data from that assay. In addition to improved consistency/reliability, these cases greatly ease the practical application of FI by consolidating data collection to a single, low-labor assay.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Parameters derived from the open-field assay ( 18 ), for which behavior is often analyzed using computer vision ( 19 ), are often included in traditional frailty assessments (eg, ( 9 )). The convenience of the open-field paradigm for analysis of multiple traits has motivated the development of mouse FI versions that rely entirely on data from that assay ( 20 ). In addition to improved reliability, these cases greatly ease the practical application of FI by consolidating data collection to a single, low-labor assay.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The FIs described above invariantly include parameters known to be modified by handling-related stress: posture, response to stimuli, exploratory behavior, and blood chemistry among them ( 26–28 ). The recent development of an ML-based FI in the context of an open-field environment ( 20 ) represents a major advance in this regard, greatly minimizing the handling of animals—though still monitoring the mice in a stressful, brightly lit environment ( 29 ). The development of systems capable of continuously monitoring mice in their home-cage environment ( 30 , 31 ) provides an avenue to increase throughput and refine longitudinal aging studies while minimizing handling-related stress as confounders of frailty assessment.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%