2018
DOI: 10.3390/a11110170
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Machine Learning View on Momentum and Reversal Trading

Abstract: Momentum and reversal effects are important phenomena in stock markets. In academia, relevant studies have been conducted for years. Researchers have attempted to analyze these phenomena using statistical methods and to give some plausible explanations. However, those explanations are sometimes unconvincing. Furthermore, it is very difficult to transfer the findings of these studies to real-world investment trading strategies due to the lack of predictive ability. This paper represents the first attempt to ado… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(33 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is no strong consensus as to which method is best when each is looked at individually. The SVM using a technical dataset type indicator in [40] and [41] has reported that it works very well by producing an accuracy rate of 71.5% and a return of 13.9 % per week compared to RF with an accuracy rate of 66.2% and a return of 10.8% per week and LR with an accuracy rate of 65.8% and a return of 11.1%. RF is the best performing method in [3] combining types of technical data sets, indicators and company fundamentals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There is no strong consensus as to which method is best when each is looked at individually. The SVM using a technical dataset type indicator in [40] and [41] has reported that it works very well by producing an accuracy rate of 71.5% and a return of 13.9 % per week compared to RF with an accuracy rate of 66.2% and a return of 10.8% per week and LR with an accuracy rate of 65.8% and a return of 11.1%. RF is the best performing method in [3] combining types of technical data sets, indicators and company fundamentals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While many studies on predicting stock price movements individually report on measuring the performance of the proposed modeling methods, there is no strong consensus as to which method is best when each is looked at individually. Lee et al [40] and Li et al [41] concluded performance the SVM performs very well compared to other machine learning algorithms such as DT and Neural Network-based (MLP & LSTMNN) by producing a higher level of accuracy and return. high.…”
Section: Best Performing Methods For Stock Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DL based models are used for predicting stock ranking [11] or one-day ahead close price [12]. They are also capable of producing superior performance while predicting momentum and reversal effects in the stock market [6] or forecasting the actual value of a stock index [13]. They tend to outperform ANN or SVM in the case of one step ahead stock movement prediction [25].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The stock price can be influenced by numerous factors such as macro-economic factors [4], the past value of technical and fundamental indicators [5], [6], or news and online search data [7], [8], [9]. It is possible to predict the movement of a single stock or the market as a whole [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pai and Lin [15] proposed a hybrid methodology that combined ARIMA with SVM model for forecasting stock prices and obtained improved results compared with any single models. Li and Tam [16] used various machine learning techniques including DT to investigate the momentum and reversal effects occurring in the stock market. Chen et al [17] compared various machine learning models with a sample dimension engineering method for Bitcoin price prediction, and proved the superiority of machine learning models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%